European Commission logo
Impact assessment

SWD/2022/359 final

This webpage provides a comprehensive overview of model use for the "SWD/2022/359 final" impact assessment. It aims to provide understanding of who ran the models, model ownership and the role models played in the impact assessment.

2
Unique Models
1
Institution that ran the Models

Who Ran the Models

2 models were run by external institutions

  • COPERT: EMISIA
  • SIBYL: EMISIA

Model Use Summary

COPERT - Computer model to calculate emissions from road traffic

Role: baseline and assessment of policy options

Run by: EMISIA

Ownership: Third-party ownership (commercial companies, Member States, other organisations, ...)

Contribution Details: COPERT was used to assess the following policy impacts as defined in the Better Regulation Toolbox: Emission of greenhouse gases, Emission of ozone-depleting substances, Emissions of acidifying, eutrophying, photochemical or harmful air pollutants, Vehicle emissions, Energy and fuel consumption.

SIBYL - Vehicle Stock, Air Pollutants, and GHG Projection Policy Evaluation Tool

Role: baseline and assessment of policy options

Run by: EMISIA

Ownership: Third-party ownership (commercial companies, Member States, other organisations, …)

Contribution Details: SIBYL was used to assess the following policy impacts as defined in the Better Regulation Toolbox: Emission of greenhouse gases, Emission of ozone-depleting substances, Emissions of acidifying, eutrophying, photochemical or harmful air pollutants, Vehicle emissions, Energy and fuel consumption, Information obligations placed on businesses, Cost/availability of essential inputs (raw materials, machinery, labour, energy, ..), Budgetary consequences for public authorities, Costs on public authorities burden.