SYNOPS-GIS
Source: Commission modelling inventory and knowledge management system (MIDAS)
Date of Report Generation: Thu Mar 06 2025
Dissemination: Public
© European Union, 2025
The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated. You may be required to clear additional rights if a specific content depicts identifiable private individuals or includes third-party works. To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the rightholders. Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the Commission's reuse policy and are not licensed to you.
Disclaimer: The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any and all information made available on or accessible through MIDAS website. The information, including but not limited to models, impact assessments, models’ input and output data, and metadata, modelling exercises and policy contributions, is of a general nature only and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, and may not be regarded as comprehensive, complete, accurate or upto-date. The Commission furthermore does not assume any responsibility for content of any external websites to which links maybe provided on this website. Any and all information provided may not be regarded as professional or legal advice. Information available through the website may not be referenced as officially adopted text of European Union regulatory or policy documents or sources. Their authentic versions can only be accessed through the Official Journal of the European Union (the printed edition or, since 1 July 2013, the electronic edition on the EUR-Lex website).
Overview
Acronym
SYNOPS-GIS
Full title
Model for synoptic assessment of risk potential of chemical plant protection products
Main purpose
SYNOPS-GIS evaluates the environmental risk on regional level for terrestrial and aquatic not target organisms by calculating the risk indices on field level and aggregating these for regional extends.
Summary
SYNOPS evaluates the risk potential for terrestrial (soil and field margins) and aquatic (surface water) organisms. It combines use data of pesticides with their application conditions and their inherent properties.
SYNOPS-GIS was developed to assess the environmental risk potential of plant protection strategies on landscape level using GIS functionalities by linking it to geo-referenced databases for land use, soil conditions and climate data and to a dataset of regionalised surveys of pesticide application. The GIS databases were established by integrating all environmental information on field level, which is necessary to estimate the environmental exposure by drift, run-off erosion and drainage.
Calculation of Exposure toxicity ratios (ETR= Predicted environmental concentration/Toxicity value of a.i.)
Model categories
AgricultureEnvironment
Model keywords
environmental risk
Model homepage
Ownership and Licence
Ownership
Third-party ownership (commercial companies, Member States, other organisations, …)
Ownership details
Licence type
Free Software licence
The license grants freedom to run the programme for any purpose; freedom to run the program for any purpose; freedom to study (by accessing the source code) how the program works, and change it so it does enable computing; freedom to redistribute copies; and freedom to distribute copies of modified versions to others.
Details
Structure and approach
The risk indicator SYNOPS models pesticide fluxes via different pathways and the resulting concentrations in soil, surface waters and field margins and therefore provides a quantitative assessment of the environmental risk due to pesticides {Strassemeyer 2017}. Risks associated with plant protection products are assessed on field level by linking geospatial data of agricultural fields in in a considered region (InVeKOS), surface waters {AdV 2015}, topography {AdV 2008}, soil characteristics {BüK 2007}, and weather data {DWD 2016}, to a of pesticide use on the specific fields. Field-specific input data for SYNOPS includes the relevant biophysical soil parameters (e.g. organic carbon content, hydrological soil class, soil texture, and field capacity), average slope, daily weather (precipitation and temperature), field margin width, and connectivity to surface waters for all the all considered agricultural fields. Information on plant protection products (active substances, concentrations, labelled mitigation measures) are derived from the German product database, and physico-chemical properties of the active substances were obtained from the Pesticides Properties Database {Lewis2016}.
A short summary of the method described in Strassemeyer et al. {Strassemeyer2017} is presented here. Risk indices are expressed as the Exposure Toxicity Ratio (ETR), calculated as the ratio of the Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC) to the toxicity endpoints half maximum effect concentration, lethal concentration, lethal rate, lethal dose, and no-effect concentration for specific reference species. The following reference species are considered: algae, aquatic invertebrates, fish, higher aquatic plants, and sediment organisms for aquatic environments; earthworm and springtails for soil; and honeybees, Aphidius rhopalosiphi, and Typhlodromus pyri for field edge habitats. Daily loads of the active substances to the three environmental compartments and a time-dependent curve of PEC were derived. Over a 365-day period, beginning with the first day of the growing season, the 90th percentile of the time-dependent PEC curves and the 90th percentile of the seven-day time-weighted average concentration are calculated to represent the worst-case scenario of acute and chronic exposure for each active substance. The acute toxicity endpoints multiplied with a factor of 0.1 and the no-effect concentration of each active substance were used to describe acute and chronic toxicity, respectively. In order to assess the mixture toxicity of the complete crop protection strategies with multiple fungicide applications and multiple active substances, the acute and chronic risk of the active substances were aggregated according to the principle of concentration addition {Zhan2012, Verro2009}. The risk values were added on a daily basis to derive ETR sum curves and the temporal 90th percentiles to represent the overall acute or chronic risk of a complete application calendars. The risk for the each compartment is calculated as maximum risk of the considered reference organisms.
Strassemeyer J, Daehmlow D, Dominic AR, Lorenz S and Golla B, SYNOPS-WEB, an online tool for environmental risk assessment to evaluate pesticide strategies on field level. Crop Prot 97:28–44 (2017).
Strassemeyer J and Golla B, Berechnung des Umweltrisikos der Pflanzenschutzmittelanwendungen in den Vergleichsbetrieben mittels SYNOPS. Gesunde Pflanz 70:10343-018 (2018).
AdV, Dokumentation zur Modellierung der Geoinformationen des amtlichen Vermessungswesens (GeoInfoDok): Erläuterungen zum ATKIS® Basis-DLM, Version 6.0.1, Stand 25.08.2015 (2015).
AdV, Dokumentation zur Modellierung der Geoinformationen des amtlichen Versuchswesens (GeoInfoDok): ATKIS-Objektartenkatalog Basis-DLM, Version 6.0, Stand 11.04.2008 (2008).
Verro R, Finizio A, Otto S and Vighi M, Predicting pesticide environmental risk in intensive agricultural areas. II: Screening level risk assessment of complex mixtures in surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 43:530–537 (2009).
Zhan Y and Zhang M, PURE: a web-based decision support system to evaluate pesticide environmental risk for sustainable pest management practices in California. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 82:104–113 (2012).
Input and parametrization
- geospatial data of agricultural fields in in a considered region
- surface waters
- topography
- oil characteristics
- weather data
- pesticide use data
- Information on plant protection products (active substances, concentrations, labelled mitigation measures)
- physico-chemical properties of the active substances were obtained from the Pesticides Properties Database
Main output
- Acute aquatic risk to aquatic non-target-organisms
- Acute aquatic risk to aquatic non-target-organisms
- Acute risk to non-target-organisms in the field margi
- Chronic risk to soil organisms
Spatial & Temporal extent
The output has the following spatial-temporal resolution and extent:
Parameter | Description |
---|---|
Spatial extent / country coverage | |
All risk values are calculated on field level and can be aggregate to any higher spatial extend by statistical methods. | |
Spatial resolution | NationalSub-national (NUTS1)Sub-national (NUTS2)Sub-national (NUTS3)Sub-national (other)MunicipalityEntityRegular Grid < 1kmRegular Grid 1km - 10kmRegular Grid 10km - 50kmRegular Grid >50km |
Temporal extent | Short-term (from 1 to 5 years) |
Temporal resolution | Days |
Quality & Transparency
Quality
Model uncertainties
Models are by definition affected by uncertainties (in input data, input parameters, scenario definitions, etc.). Have the model uncertainties been quantified? Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?
- response
- no
- details
- too demanding
- url
Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis helps identifying the uncertain inputs mostly responsible for the uncertainty in the model responses. Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?
- response
- yes
- details
- url
Have model results been published in peer-reviewed articles?
- response
- yes
- details
- url
Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?
Please note that this does not refer to the cases when model results were validated by stakeholders.
- response
- no
- details
- url
Model validation
Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?
- response
- yes
- details
- For a small catchment and a small set of active ingredients
- url
Transparency
To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?
This may include sources accessible upon subscription and/or payment
- response
- Entirely based on publicly available sources
Is the full model database as such available to external users?
Whether or not it implies a specific procedure or a fee
- response
- yes
- details
- Weather data, phenology data, soil data, the product database and active ingredient data can be provided by public web services. All web-services are based on public available data. Additional data can be requested by e-mail: sf@julius-kuehn.de
- url
Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?
Note this excludes IA reports.
- response
- yes
- details
Have output datasets been made publicly available?
Note this could also imply a specific procedure or a fee.
- response
- yes
Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?
For instance: Dashboard, interactive interfaces...
- response
- yes
Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?
Note this excludes IA reports.
- response
- no
- details
Is there a dedicated public website where information about the model is provided?
- response
- yes
Is the model code open-source?
- response
- no
- details
Can the code be accessed upon request?
- response
- yes
- details
The model’s policy relevance and intended role in the policy cycle
The model is designed to contribute to the following policy areas
- Agriculture and rural development
The model is designed to contribute to the following phases of the policy cycle
- Evaluation – such as ex-post evaluation
The model’s potential
Not provided
Previous use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments of the European Commission
Use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments since July 2017.
2023SWD/2023/412 final
Impact Assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625
- Lead by
- SANTE
- Run by
- Julius Kühn Institute
- Contribution role
- baseline and assessment of policy options
- Contribution details
The model helped to assess the following impacts:
- Availability or quality of Fresh- or ground water
- Number of species
- Acidification, contamination or salinity of soil, and soil erosion rates
- Polution by businesses