RunDynam
Source: Commission modelling inventory and knowledge management system (MIDAS)
Date of Report Generation: Thu Mar 06 2025
Dissemination: Public
© European Union, 2025
The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated. You may be required to clear additional rights if a specific content depicts identifiable private individuals or includes third-party works. To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the rightholders. Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the Commission's reuse policy and are not licensed to you.
Disclaimer: The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any and all information made available on or accessible through MIDAS website. The information, including but not limited to models, impact assessments, models’ input and output data, and metadata, modelling exercises and policy contributions, is of a general nature only and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, and may not be regarded as comprehensive, complete, accurate or upto-date. The Commission furthermore does not assume any responsibility for content of any external websites to which links maybe provided on this website. Any and all information provided may not be regarded as professional or legal advice. Information available through the website may not be referenced as officially adopted text of European Union regulatory or policy documents or sources. Their authentic versions can only be accessed through the Official Journal of the European Union (the printed edition or, since 1 July 2013, the electronic edition on the EUR-Lex website).
Overview
Acronym
RunDynam
Full title
Recursive Dynamic Model - RunDynam
Main purpose
A general equilibrium model used to analyse international trade policies scenarios.
Summary
Together with the GTAP database, Rundynam can be used to simulate different trade policy scenarios for more than 140 countries/regions and for around 65 sectors (agriculture, food, manufacturing and services).These tools allow to evaluate the impact in terms of export, import, GDP and sectoral output.
Rundynam is a model developed in the Center for Global Trade Analysis, at the Purdue University. It is a global network of researchers and policymakers conducting quantitative analysis of international policy issues. It also develops collaboration among academia, public sector and private sectors worldwide.
The use of economic models, like RunDynam, helps policy making with an economic theoretically consistent framework for analyzing trade policy questions. These types of models help to answer 'what if…' questions by simulating the price, income and substitution effects of different policy changes and comparing them to a so-called baseline (i.e., what would happen without a policy change). The baseline is key as it is the counterfactual against which the economic outcome of the initiative is assessed. Hence, CGE models allow economists to simulate, at the same time, how all sectors and actors adjust to the changes to costs, prices and/or incentives that a trade policy change would cause. This allows for an ex-ante assessment of all the direct and indirect effects of changes to trade policy. Usually, model results regard change in GDP, import and export flows, sectoral output, resources reallocation and price effect.
RunDynam, and similar models, are widely applied for providing the economic impact assessment of a trade policy agreement. The main advantage of CGE models is that they analyse the effects of trade policy taking into account the main links between the domestic and international production of goods and services.
Model categories
Economy
Model keywords
CGE
Model homepage
Ownership and Licence
Ownership
Co-ownership (EU & third parties)
Ownership details
Licence type
Non-Free Software licence
The license has one or more of the following restrictions: it prohibits creation of derivative works; it prohibits commercial use; it obliges to share the licensed or derivative works on the same conditions.
Details
Structure and approach
RunDynam is a recursively dynamic applied general equilibrium model of the world economy and is built upon the Social Accounting Matrices (SAMs) of individual countries and regions. This model extends the comparative static framework of the standard GTAP model developed by Hertel (1997) to a dynamic framework by incorporating international capital mobility and capital accumulation, while preserving all the features of the standard GTAP, such as constant returns to production technology, perfectly competitive markets and product differentiation by countries of origin – the so-called Armington assumption. RunDynam allows constructing a baseline (which may be a forecast) and policy deviations from the baseline. Users can view the results of the base case or policy deviation on the screen or export them to other programs. The model allows to simulate trade measure change, like tariffs cuts, in order to analyze the possible trade creation and trade deviation.
RunDynam relies on the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP). GTAP is a global network of researchers and policy makers conducting quantitative analysis of international policy issues. GTAP's goal is to improve the quality of quantitative analysis of global economic issues within an economy-wide framework. The GTAP network provides a global data base describing bilateral trade patterns, production, consumption and intermediate use of commodities and services. The latest version of the database, V10, refers to 2014 as reference year and covers 141 regions and 65 sectors (https://www.jgea.org/resources/jgea/ojs/index.php/jgea/article/view/77).
Input and parametrization
The impact of a trade policy shock cannot be evaluated without a baseline i.e. the counterfactual situation in which the economy would have been should there have been no trade policy change. Creating a realistic baseline is as difficult as it is important. The Commission usually relies upon predictions about the future by others, such as short term projections on GDP growth from the IMF and longer term projections on e.g. population from the UN, but also on energy consumption, labour participation rates, etc.
Main output
Output comes in the form of results on a wide range of indicators such as: (i) GDP or welfare (equivalent variation); (ii) Impact by sector in terms of exports, imports, production and value added reflecting inter -sectoral input -output links including sourcing of inputs (goods and services) from abroad; (iii) Impact on factors of production (land, capital and labour of various skill categories) in terms of e.g. wages and (iv) CO2 emissions, land use, etc.
Spatial & Temporal extent
The output has the following spatial-temporal resolution and extent:
Parameter | Description |
---|---|
Spatial extent / country coverage | |
141 regions | |
Spatial resolution | World-regions (supranational)National |
Temporal extent | Short-term (from 1 to 5 years)Medium-term (5 to 15 years)Long-term (more than 15 years) |
Baseline 2014 | |
Temporal resolution | Years |
Quality & Transparency
Quality
Model uncertainties
Models are by definition affected by uncertainties (in input data, input parameters, scenario definitions, etc.). Have the model uncertainties been quantified? Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?
- response
- not applicable
- details
- Not applicable for a CGE model.
- url
Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis helps identifying the uncertain inputs mostly responsible for the uncertainty in the model responses. Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?
- response
- yes
- details
- Both RunGTAP and RunDynam, the static and the dynamic version of the GTAP model, include a in-build tool to perform sensitivity analysis with respect to parameters.
- url
Have model results been published in peer-reviewed articles?
- response
- yes
- details
- GTAP model has been widely used in many publications. There is also a specific journal focused on GTAP modelling.
- url
Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?
Please note that this does not refer to the cases when model results were validated by stakeholders.
- response
- no
- details
- url
Model validation
Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?
- response
- yes
- details
- The network of GTAP users represents an excellent resource for extension of the data base. Another benefit from broad participation is the extensive scrutiny to which the data base is subjected. Those who identify areas for improvement or extension of the data base are free to make this available to GTAP staff in order to have it considered for incorporation into the next release of the data base. The operational concept is "if you don't like it, help fix it!
- url
Transparency
To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?
This may include sources accessible upon subscription and/or payment
- response
- Entirely based on publicly available sources
Is the full model database as such available to external users?
Whether or not it implies a specific procedure or a fee
- response
- yes
- details
- Public Availability. The data base is made available to anyone requesting it, at a modest fee. This prevents needless duplication of effort in creating this public good. By charging for the data base we are also able to cover a portion of the costs incurred in constructing it. However, those who contribute in a significant way to the construction of this data base receive it for free, and are given access to pre-releases as well, alongside the GTAP Consortium members who provide the bulk of the financial support through their annual contributions to the Project.
- url
Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?
Note this excludes IA reports.
- response
- yes
- details
Have output datasets been made publicly available?
Note this could also imply a specific procedure or a fee.
- response
- no
- details
- url
Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?
For instance: Dashboard, interactive interfaces...
- response
- no
- details
- url
Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?
Note this excludes IA reports.
- response
- yes
- details
- One requirement for new contributions to the GTAP Data Base is that the sources and procedures used to create them be provided along with the data. This publication represents a summary of the documentation for the GTAP Data Base. Additional detail may be found on the GTAP website, or in the documentation of previous versions of GTAP. However, in spite of this extensive documentation, other questions about data sources and methods may arise. Therefore, we refer interested users to the chapter authors themselves in those cases where this document is insufficiently detailed. Often it is only through bilateral correspondence of this sort that data base limitations can be properly identified and remedied This takes us to the final ingredient of the GTAP Data Base, namely quality control.
Is there a dedicated public website where information about the model is provided?
- response
- yes
Is the model code open-source?
- response
- yes
- details
- url
Can the code be accessed upon request?
- response
- not applicable
- details
The model’s policy relevance and intended role in the policy cycle
The model is designed to contribute to the following policy areas
- Trade
The model is designed to contribute to the following phases of the policy cycle
- Evaluation – such as ex-post evaluation
- Formulation – such as ex-ante Impact Assessments
The model’s potential
CGE models, like RunDynam, are computer-based simulations which calculate the future state of the global economy (including any country or region specifically analysed) as a consequence of a specified set of (trade) policy changes.
RunDynam is used, among other models and other approaches, for the economic analysis (Impact Assessment) within the different steps of any EU trade policy initiative. A Commission Impact assessment (IA) is needed before major trade negotiations can begin and for all other significant trade policy proposal, a trade sustainability impact assessment (SIA) is carried out during negotiations process and finally the economic assessment of the negotiated outcome (EANO) focuses on the economic value of trade barrier reductions following the final, precise outcome of the negotiations. In all these steps, RunDynam could be used for the economic assessment.
Reference for EC Impact assessment can be found here: https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/negotiations-and-agreements/.
Previous use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments of the European Commission
Use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments since July 2017.
2017SWD/2017/0293 final
Impact assessment accompanying the document Recommendation for a Council Decision: authorising the opening of negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement with Australia
- Lead by
- TRADE
- Run by
- European Commission
- Contribution role
- baseline and assessment of policy options
- Contribution details
The model helped to assess the following impacts:
- Additional costs on businesses
- EU Exports & imports
- Investment flows & trade in services
- Non-trade barriers
- Impacts on developing countries
- Goods traded with developing countries
- Economic growth and employment
2017SWD/2017/0289 final
Impact assessment accompanying the document Recommendation for a Council Decision: authorising the opening of negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement with New Zealand
- Lead by
- TRADE
- Run by
- European Commission
- Contribution role
- baseline and assessment of policy options
- Contribution details
The model helped to assess the following impacts:
- Additional costs on businesses
- EU Exports & imports
- Investment flows & trade in services
- Non-trade barriers
- Impacts on developing countries
- Goods traded with developing countries
- Economic growth and employment