Annex 4 analytical methods

model description

general description

acronym
RunDynam
name
Recursive Dynamic Model - RunDynam
main purpose
A general equilibrium model used to analyse international trade policies scenarios.
homepage

Developer and its nature

ownership
Co-ownership (EU & third parties)
ownership additional info
Based on GTAP Data Base (Purdue University, USA) and GEMPACKcode (Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University, Australia).
is the model code open-source?
YES

Model structure and approach with any key assumptions, limitations and simplifications

details on model structure and approach

RunDynam is a recursively dynamic applied general equilibrium model of the world economy and is built upon the Social Accounting Matrices (SAMs) of individual countries and regions. This model extends the comparative static framework of the standard GTAP model developed by Hertel (1997)  to a dynamic framework by incorporating international capital mobility and capital accumulation, while preserving all the features of the standard GTAP, such as constant returns to production technology, perfectly competitive markets and product differentiation by countries of origin – the so-called Armington assumption. RunDynam allows constructing a baseline (which may be a forecast) and policy deviations from the baseline. Users can view the results of the base case or policy deviation on the screen or export them to other programs. The model allows to simulate trade measure change, like tariffs cuts, in order to analyze the possible trade creation and trade deviation.

RunDynam relies on the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP). GTAP is a global network of researchers and policy makers conducting quantitative analysis of international policy issues. GTAP's goal is to improve the quality of quantitative analysis of global economic issues within an economy-wide framework. The GTAP network provides a global data base describing bilateral trade patterns, production, consumption and intermediate use of commodities and services. The latest version of the database, V10, refers to 2014 as reference year and covers 141 regions and 65 sectors (https://www.jgea.org/resources/jgea/ojs/index.php/jgea/article/view/77).

model inputs

The impact of a trade policy shock cannot be evaluated without a baseline i.e. the counterfactual situation in which the economy would have been should there have been no trade policy change. Creating a realistic baseline is as difficult as it is important. The Commission usually relies upon predictions about the future by others, such as short term projections on GDP growth from the IMF and longer term projections on e.g. population from the UN, but also on energy consumption, labour participation rates, etc.

model outputs

Output comes in the form of results on a wide range of indicators such as: (i) GDP or welfare (equivalent variation); (ii) Impact by sector in terms of exports, imports, production and value added reflecting  inter -sectoral input -output links including sourcing of inputs (goods and services) from abroad; (iii) Impact on factors of production (land, capital and labour of various skill categories) in terms of e.g. wages and (iv) CO2 emissions, land use, etc.

Intended field of application

policy role

CGE models, like RunDynam, are computer-based simulations which calculate the future state of the global economy (including any country or region specifically analysed) as a consequence of a specified set of (trade) policy changes.

RunDynam is used, among other models and other approaches, for the economic analysis (Impact Assessment) within the different steps of any EU trade policy initiative. A Commission Impact assessment (IA) is needed before major trade negotiations can begin and for all other significant trade policy proposal, a trade sustainability impact assessment (SIA) is carried out during negotiations process and finally the economic assessment of the negotiated outcome (EANO) focuses on the economic value of trade barrier reductions following the final, precise outcome of the negotiations. In all these steps, RunDynam could be used for the economic assessment.

Reference for EC Impact assessment can be found here: https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/negotiations-and-agreements/.

policy areas
  • Trade 

Model transparency and quality assurance

Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?
NOT_APPLICABLE - Not applicable for a CGE model.
Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?
YES - Both RunGTAP and RunDynam, the static and the dynamic version of the GTAP model, include a in-build tool to perform sensitivity analysis with respect to parameters.
Has the model been published in peer review articles?
YES - GTAP model has been widely used in many publications. There is also a specific journal focused on GTAP modelling.
Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?
NO
Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?
YES - The network of GTAP users represents an excellent resource for extension of the data base. Another benefit from broad participation is the extensive scrutiny to which the data base is subjected. Those who identify areas for improvement or extension of the data base are free to make this available to GTAP staff in order to have it considered for incorporation into the next release of the data base. The operational concept is "if you don't like it, help fix it!
To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?
Entirely based on publicly available sources
Is the full model database as such available to external users?
YES - Public Availability. The data base is made available to anyone requesting it, at a modest fee. This prevents needless duplication of effort in creating this public good. By charging for the data base we are also able to cover a portion of the costs incurred in constructing it. However, those who contribute in a significant way to the construction of this data base receive it for free, and are given access to pre-releases as well, alongside the GTAP Consortium members who provide the bulk of the financial support through their annual contributions to the Project.
Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?
YES
Have output datasets been made publicly available?
NO
Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?
NO
Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?
YES - One requirement for new contributions to the GTAP Data Base is that the sources and procedures used to create them be provided along with the data. This publication represents a summary of the documentation for the GTAP Data Base. Additional detail may be found on the GTAP website, or in the documentation of previous versions of GTAP. However, in spite of this extensive documentation, other questions about data sources and methods may arise. Therefore, we refer interested users to the chapter authors themselves in those cases where this document is insufficiently detailed. Often it is only through bilateral correspondence of this sort that data base limitations can be properly identified and remedied This takes us to the final ingredient of the GTAP Data Base, namely quality control.

Intellectual property rights

Licence type
Non-Free Software licence

application to the impact assessment

Please note that in the annex 4 of the impact assessment report, the general description of the model (available in MIDAS) has to be complemented with the specific information on how the model has been applied in the impact assessment.

See Better Regulation Toolbox, tool #11 Format of the impact assessment report).