POLES

Prospective Outlook for the Long term Energy System
Fact Sheet

Source: Commission modelling inventory and knowledge management system (MIDAS)

Date of Report Generation: Thu Mar 06 2025

Dissemination: Public

© European Union, 2025

The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated. You may be required to clear additional rights if a specific content depicts identifiable private individuals or includes third-party works. To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the rightholders. Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the Commission's reuse policy and are not licensed to you.

Disclaimer: The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any and all information made available on or accessible through MIDAS website. The information, including but not limited to models, impact assessments, models’ input and output data, and metadata, modelling exercises and policy contributions, is of a general nature only and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, and may not be regarded as comprehensive, complete, accurate or upto-date. The Commission furthermore does not assume any responsibility for content of any external websites to which links maybe provided on this website. Any and all information provided may not be regarded as professional or legal advice. Information available through the website may not be referenced as officially adopted text of European Union regulatory or policy documents or sources. Their authentic versions can only be accessed through the Official Journal of the European Union (the printed edition or, since 1 July 2013, the electronic edition on the EUR-Lex website).

Overview

Acronym

POLES

Full title

Prospective Outlook for the Long term Energy System

Main purpose

POLES is a world energy demand and supply and greenhouse gas emissions model used for international energy and climate policy assessment.

Summary

The POLES model is a global sectoral simulation model for the development of energy and greenhouse gases scenarios until 2050 (2100 for research projects). It has been developed by the JRC since 1996, and JRC runs the POLES-JRC version, which also includes a module on emissions of air pollutants.    

The dynamics of the energy system are based on a recursive (year by year) simulation process of energy demand and supply with lagged adjustments to prices and a feedback loop through international energy prices. The model is developed within the framework of a hierarchical structure of interconnected modules at the international, regional and national level. It contains technologically-detailed modules for energy-intensive sectors, including power generation, non-metallic minerals and chemistry, as well as detail of energy uses in buildings and modal transportation sectors. The model also provides a complete coverage of greenhouse gas emissions: the detailed energy system gives the evolution of CO2 from fossil fuels combustion; emissions from industry are derived from the description of the economy structure while agriculture and land use emissions come from a reduced form of the specialist GLOBIOM model. All GHG emissions can be affected by climate mitigation policy.

The model supports policy anticipation and formulation by developing consistent global energy scenarios that feed in to policy developments in the field of energy and climate change. The scenarios provide the input for climate negotiations under the UNFCCC and a consistent global energy outlook as boundary conditions for more detailed analyses of the EU energy markets and related policy areas.

Model categories

ClimateEnergy

Model keywords

Climate policyEnergy modelenergy policyscenario analysis

Model homepage

Ownership and Licence

Ownership

Co-ownership (EU & third parties)

Ownership details

The model is developed and operated by the JRC. Research versions are developed in collaboration with the University of Grenoble-CNRS (GAEL laboratory), and some model upgrades have been done with Enerdata. University of Grenoble-CNRS and Enerdata run own versions for their specific use (not for informing EC policy and conducting IAs).  

Licence type

Non-Free Software licence

The license has one or more of the following restrictions: it prohibits creation of derivative works; it prohibits commercial use; it obliges to share the licensed or derivative works on the same conditions.

Details

Structure and approach

POLES is a global recursive dynamic simulation model of the energy system allowing simulating a wide range of energy and climate policies, being they on the demand side or in the supply sector. It displays a high regional resolution and sectoral representation, and provides endogenous simulation of all steps of the energy system by energy vector and sector: final energy demand, transformation (including power generation), trade, primary supply, international and final user prices, as well as the development of energy-consuming equipment. GHG emissions from fossil fuel combustion, industry, waste, agriculture and land use are also covered. Anthropogenic air pollution can also be covered.

Input and parametrization

Main inputs are:  

  • Projection / framing conditions: population, GDP growth, economic structure, energy resources
  • Historical: socio-economic activity variables (mobility per transport mode, freight volumes, vehicles stock, buildings stock), energy balance (production, demand, transformation, power capacities, prices), technology costs, sectoral GHG emissions.
  • Parameters: demand function elasticities, energy efficiency technological trends, technology learning rate

Key input assumptions include socio-economics (population and growth of GDP) and energy resources.    Population is an exogenous driver, standard source used is the UN World Population.  GDP is also exogenous and is derived from various international sources. Latest work used GDP assumptions from: latest IMF forecasts (for the short run), OECD, or CEPII forecasts (for the longer run). Consistency with population is checked.  Energy resources come from various international sources, including BGR and USGS. 

The model also uses historical databases on energy production, energy demand, energy prices, energy trade, power generation capacities, GHG emissions and other key activity data (sectoral value added, mobility per mode, freight volumes, vehicles stock, buildings stock).  Assumptions on technology costs are also included, either as full prospective data series or as to inform endogenously recreated learning curves.  Additional parameters consist in econometric elasticities and policy-dependent energy efficiency improvement trends.

Finally, key inputs are bioenergy cost curves and land-related GHG emissions cost curves from the GLOBIOM model.

Main output

  • Projected socio-economic activity variables: sectoral value added, tons of steel consumed and produced, mobility per transport mode, freight volumes, vehicles stock, buildings stock
  • Projected energy balance per country / region: energy production, energy demand, energy trade (in energy terms), energy transformation, power capacities, energy prices
  • Investment needs, technology costs, energy trade (in economic value)
  • Projected sectoral GHG emissions for energy, industry, agriculture and LULUCF

Spatial & Temporal extent

The output has the following spatial-temporal resolution and extent:

ParameterDescription
Spatial extent / country coverageEU Member states 27ALADI countriesAndean Community countriesArab Common Market countriesCACM countriesASEAN countriesEFTA countriesOECD countriesCAIS countriesOPEC countriesLAES countriesCAEMC countriesWAEMU countriesWestern BalkansBenelux countriesACP countriesComecon countriesCaricom countriesEcowas countriesGCC countriesMercosur countriesMediterranean third countriesCentral and Eastern European CountriesAAMS countriesAPEC countriesCEFTA countriesEAC countriescountries of the Pacific CommunitySAARC countriesCAEU countriesBRICS countriesALL countries of the WORLD
66 geographical units: 54 countries and 12 regions made of country aggregates covering the World. Countries include all OECD countries and large non-OECD countries. All G20 countries and EU27 Member States are explicitly represented. For the energy supply side, a more detailed geographical split is followed, with 88 oil and gas producers, and 81 coal producers.
Spatial resolutionWorld-regions (supranational)National
Temporal extentLong-term (more than 15 years)
Time horizon 2050 (optional 2100)
Temporal resolutionYears
Yearly for projections; hourly detail for representative days in the modelling of power demand/supply

Quality & Transparency

Quality

Model uncertainties

Models are by definition affected by uncertainties (in input data, input parameters, scenario definitions, etc.). Have the model uncertainties been quantified? Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?

no
Different model runs can be done with different settings to represent uncertainty in model parameters.

    Sensitivity analysis

    Sensitivity analysis helps identifying the uncertain inputs mostly responsible for the uncertainty in the model responses. Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?

    yes
    In multiple occasions, batch runs have been done to test the model's reactiveness to different values of a single input parameter (carbon price, technology costs…).

      Have model results been published in peer-reviewed articles?

      yes
      The model has participated in inter-model comparison exercises for many years, in which peers compare models' results and methodologies, and has participated in many peer-reviewed papers.

        Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?

        Please note that this does not refer to the cases when model results were validated by stakeholders.

        no

          Model validation

          Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?

          not applicable
          Historic period (from 1990 to current year -1 or -2) is used to calibrate parameters that allow the model to endogenously reproduce observed patterns.

            Transparency

            To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?

            This may include sources accessible upon subscription and/or payment

            Based on both publicly available and restricted-access sources

            Is the full model database as such available to external users?

            Whether or not it implies a specific procedure or a fee

            no
            A large part of input data is not public. The full list of data sources is available in the POLES-JRC manual. Additional data can be provided on demand.

              Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?

              Note this excludes IA reports.

              yes

              For details please refer to the 'peer review for model validation' documents in the bibliographic references

              Have output datasets been made publicly available?

              Note this could also imply a specific procedure or a fee.

              yes
              Examples of output data made available are energy and GHG emissions balances provided with the GECO report(s), as well as a web interface to navigate results and access data on the GECO web site

                Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?

                For instance: Dashboard, interactive interfaces...

                no

                  Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?

                  Note this excludes IA reports.

                  yes

                  Is there a dedicated public website where information about the model is provided?

                  yes

                  Is the model code open-source?

                  no

                  Can the code be accessed upon request?

                  no

                  The model’s policy relevance and intended role in the policy cycle

                  The model is designed to contribute to the following policy areas

                  • Agriculture and rural development
                  • Climate action
                  • Energy
                  • Environment
                  • Transport

                  The model is designed to contribute to the following phases of the policy cycle

                  • Anticipation – such as foresight and horizon scanning
                  • Formulation – such as ex-ante Impact Assessments
                  • Other

                  The model’s potential

                  POLES is designed to contribute primarily to the following policy areas:  Climate Action, Energy. It could also be used in the following policy areas: Agricultural, Environment, Trade, Transport.

                  POLES can be used to support policy anticipation and formulation by developing consistent global energy scenarios that feed in to policy developments in the field of energy and climate change. The model has been and is still very much used to assess the impact of European and international energy and climate policies on energy markets and GHG emissions, by DG CLIMA in the context of international climate policy negotiations and by DG ENER in the context of the EU Energy Union.

                  POLES has also been applied for the analyses of various Impact Assessments in the field of climate change and energy, among them: the Proposal for a revised energy efficiency Directive (COM(2016)0761 final)  and The Paris Protocol – A blueprint for tackling global climate change beyond 2020 (COM(2015) 81 final/2).

                  The model is being extended towards co-benefits of energy and climate policy in terms of land use and water use.

                  Previous use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments of the European Commission

                  Use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments since July 2017.

                  2024
                  SWD/2024/63 final

                  Impact Assessment Report Part 1 Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Securing our future Europe's 2040 climate target and path to climate neutrality by 2050 building a sustainable, just and prosperous society

                  Lead by
                  CLIMA
                  Run by
                  EnerFuture: Global Energy Forecasts
                  Contribution role
                  baseline and assessment of policy options
                  Contribution details

                  The POLES model is used to provide the global climate and energy policy context. The POLES model is the main tool used for the JRC “Global Energy and Climate Outlook” GECO report series, which provides a detailed analysis of the evolution of global GHG emissions under national climate and energy pledges and of global pathways compatible with the Paris Agreement temperature objectives. POLES has also been used to indicate high-level cost-effective decarbonisation pathways for the energy and industry CO2 sectors.

                  Bibliographic references

                  Studies that uses the model or its results

                  Climate impacts in Europe: Final report of the JRC PESETA III project 

                  Published in 2018
                  Ciscar Martinez, J., Ibarreta Ruiz, D., Soria Ramirez, A., Dosio, A., Toreti, A., Ceglar, A., Fumagalli, D., Dentener, F., Lecerf, R., Zucchini, A., Panarello, L., Niemeyer, S., Perez Dominguez, I., Fellmann, T., Kitous, A., Després, J., Christodoulou, A., Demirel, H., Alfieri, L., Dottori, F., Vousdoukas, M., Mentaschi, L., Voukouvalas, E., Cammalleri, C., Marinho Ferreira Barbosa, P., Micale, F., Vogt, J., Barredo Cano, J., Caudullo, G., Mauri, A., De Rigo, D., Liberta`, G., Durrant, T., Artes Vivancos, T., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Gosling, S., Zaherpour, J., De Roo, A., Bisselink, B., Bernhard, J., Bianchi, A., Rózsai, M., Szewczyk, W., Mongelli, I. and Feyen, L., Climate impacts in Europe , EUR 29427 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, ISBN 978-92-79-97218-8 (online), doi:10.2760/93257 (online), JRC112769.

                  Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2018: Sectoral mitigation options towards a low-emissions economy 

                  Published in 2018
                  Keramidas, K., Tchung-Ming, S., Diaz Vazquez, A., Weitzel, M., Vandyck, T., Després, J., Schmitz, A., Rey Los Santos, L., Wojtowicz, K., Schade, B., Saveyn, B. and Soria Ramirez, A., Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2018: Sectoral mitigation options towards a low-emissions economy, EUR 29462 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, ISBN 978-92-79-97462-5 (online), doi:10.2760/67475 (online), JRC113446.

                  Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways 

                  Published in 2018
                  Luderer, G., Vrontisi, Z., Bertram, C., Edelenbosch, O., Pietzcker, R., Rogelj, J., De Boerc, H., Drouet, L., Emmerling, J., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Havlik, P., Iyer, G., Keramidas, K., Kitous, A., Pehl, M., Krey, V., Riahi, K., Saveyn, B., Tavoni, M., Van Vuuren, D. and Kriegler, E., Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways, NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, ISSN 1758-678X, 8, 2018, p. 626–633, JRC108391.

                  Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5°C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment 

                  Published in 2018
                  Vrontisi, Z., Luderer, G., Saveyn, B., Keramidas, K., Aleluia Reis, L., Baumstark, L., Bertram, C., De Boer, H., Drouet, L., Fragkiadakis, K., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Guivarch, C., Kitous, A., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Ó Broin, E., Paroussos, L. and Van Vuuren, D., Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5°C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment, ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, ISSN 1748-9326, 13 (4), 2018, JRC108393.

                  Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2017: How climate policies improve air quality 

                  Published in 2017
                  Kitous, A., Keramidas, K., Vandyck, T., Saveyn, B., Van Dingenen, R., Spadaro, J. and Holland, M., Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2017: How climate policies improve air quality, EUR 28798 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79-73864-7 (online),978-92-79-75275-9 (ePub), doi:10.2760/474356 (online),10.2760/34111 (ePub), JRC107944.

                  Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2017: Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances: Supplementary material to "Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2017: How climate policies improve air quality" 

                  Published in 2017
                  Kitous, A. and Keramidas, K., Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2017: Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances: Supplementary material to "Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2017: How climate policies improve air quality", EUR 28725 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79-71653-9, doi:10.2760/034229, JRC107366.

                  GECO 2016: Global Energy and Climate Outlook: Road from Paris: Impact of climate policies on global energy markets in the context of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement 

                  Published in 2016
                  Kitous A; Keramidas K; Vandyck T; Saveyn B. GECO 2016: Global Energy and Climate Outlook: Road from Paris: Impact of climate policies on global energy markets in the context of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement. EUR 27952 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. JRC101899

                  GECO 2016: GHG and energy balances 

                  Published in 2016
                  Kitous A; Keramidas K. GECO 2016: GHG and energy balances. EUR 27976 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. JRC101924

                  Pathways to Mexico’s Climate Change Mitigation Targets: A Multi-Model Analysis 

                  Published in 2016
                  Veysey J, Octaviano C, Calvin K, Herreras S, Kitous A, Mcfarland J, Van Der Zwaan B. Pathways to Mexico’s Climate Change Mitigation Targets: A Multi-Model Analysis. ENERGY ECONOMICS 56; 2016. p. 587-599. JRC96033

                  A global stocktake of the Paris pledges: Implications for energy systems and economy 

                  Published in 2016
                  Vandyck T; Keramidas K; Saveyn B; Kitous A; Vrontisi Z. A global stocktake of the Paris pledges: Implications for energy systems and economy. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS 41; 2016. p. 46-63. JRC101134

                  A multi-model study of energy supply investments in Latin America under climate control policy 

                  Published in 2016
                  Kober T; Falzon J; Van Der Zwaan B; Calvin K; Kanudia A; Kitous A; Labriet M. A multi-model study of energy supply investments in Latin America under climate control policy. ENERGY ECONOMICS 56; 2016. p. 543-551. JRC92319

                  Climate Policy Scenarios in Brazil: a Multi-Model Comparison for Energy 

                  Published in 2016
                  Lucena A; Clarke L; Schaeffer R; Szklo A; Rochedo P; Nogueira L; Daenzer K; Gurgel A; Kitous A; Kober T. Climate Policy Scenarios in Brazil: a Multi-Model Comparison for Energy. ENERGY ECONOMICS 56; 2016. p. 564-574. JRC92320

                  Baseline projections for Latin America: base-year assumptions, key drivers and greenhouse emissions 

                  Published in 2016
                  Van Ruijven B; Daenzer K; Fisher-Vanden K; Kober T; Paltsev S; Beach R; Calderon S; Calvin K; Labriet M; Kitous A; Lucena A; Van Vuuren D. Baseline projections for Latin America: base-year assumptions, key drivers and greenhouse emissions. ENERGY ECONOMICS 56; 2016. p. 499-512. JRC92318

                  GECO2015. Global Energy and Climate Outlook. Road to Paris. Assessment of Low Emission Levels under World Action Integrating National Contributions 

                  Published in 2015
                  Labat A, Kitous A, Perry M, Saveyn B, Vandyck T, Vrontisi Z. GECO2015. Global Energy and Climate Outlook. Road to Paris. Assessment of Low Emission Levels under World Action Integrating National Contributions. EUR 27239. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2015. JRC95892

                  GECO 2015 - GHG and energy balances 

                  Published in 2015
                  Kitous A. GECO 2015 - GHG and energy balances. EUR 27242. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2015. JRC95759

                  CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies 

                  Published in 2015
                  Bauer N, Bosetti V, Hamdi-Cherif M, Kitous A, Mccollum D, Mejean A, Rao S, Turton H, Paroussos L, Ashina S, Calvin K, Wada K, Van Vuuren D. CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: Dynamic and international aspects of climate policies. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE 90 (Part A); 2015. p. 243-256. JRC85433

                  Locked into Copenhagen pledges - Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals 

                  Published in 2015
                  Riahi, K., Kriegler, E., Johnson, N., Bertram, C., den Elzen, M., Eom, J., … Edenhofer, O. (2015). Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 8–23. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016

                  Future perspectives of international bioenergy trade 

                  Published in 2015
                  Matzenberger, J., Kranzl, L., Tromborg, E., Junginger, M., Daioglou, V., Sheng Goh, C., & Keramidas, K. (2015). Future perspectives of international bioenergy trade. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 926–941. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.106

                  Impact of low oil prices on the EU economy 

                  Published in 2015
                  Vrontisi Z, Kitous A, Saveyn B, Vandyck T. Impact of low oil prices on the EU economy . EUR 27537. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2015. JRC98188

                  Mitigation strategies and energy technology learning: An assessment with the POLES model 

                  Published in 2015
                  Criqui, P., Mima, S., Menanteau, P., & Kitous, A. (2015). Mitigation strategies and energy technology learning: An assessment with the POLES model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 119–136. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.005

                  Climate Impacts in Europe. The JRC PESETA II Project 

                  Published in 2014
                  Ciscar Martinez J, Feyen L, Soria Ramirez A, Lavalle C, Raes F, Perry M, Nemry F, Demirel H, Rózsai M, Dosio A, Donatelli M, Srivastava A, Fumagalli D, Niemeyer S, Shrestha S, Ciaian P, Himics M, Van Doorslaer B, Barrios S, Ibanez Rivas J, Forzieri G, Rojas Mujica R, Bianchi A, Dowling P, Camia A, Liberta` G, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, De Rigo D, Caudullo G, Barredo Cano J, Paci D, Pycroft J, Saveyn B, Van Regemorter D, Revesz T, Vandyck T, Vrontisi Z, Baranzelli C, Vandecasteele I, Batista E Silva F, Ibarreta Ruiz D, authors Ciscar Martinez J, editor. Climate Impacts in Europe. The JRC PESETA II Project . EUR 26586. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2014. JRC87011

                  Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds 

                  Published in 2014
                  Mccollum D, Bauer N, Calvin K, Kitous A, Riahi K. Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds. CLIMATIC CHANGE 123 (3-4); 2014. p. 413–426. JRC96000

                  Conflict and cooperation over access to energy: Implications for a low-carbon future 

                  Published in 2014
                  Andrews-Speed, P., van der Linde, C., & Keramidas, K. (2014). Conflict and cooperation over access to energy: Implications for a low-carbon future. Futures, 58, 103–114. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.12.007

                  Low climate stabilisation under diverse growth and convergence scenarios 

                  Published in 2014
                  Markandya, A., González-Eguino, M., Criqui, P., & Mima, S. (2014). Low climate stabilisation under diverse growth and convergence scenarios. Energy Policy, 64, 288–301. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.046

                  A Comparability Analysis of Global Burden Sharing GHG Reduction Scenarios 

                  Published in 2013
                  Ciscar, J.-C., Saveyn, B., Soria, A., Szabo, L., Van Regemorter, D., & Van Ierland, T. (2013). A comparability analysis of global burden sharing GHG reduction scenarios. Energy Policy, 55, 73–81. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.044

                  Analysis of Iran Oil Embargo 

                  Published in 2013
                  Kitous A, Saveyn B, Gervais S, Wiesenthal T, Soria Ramirez A. ANALYSIS OF THE IRAN OIL EMBARGO. EUR 25691. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2013. JRC77983

                  The Impact of Climate Change on the European Energy System 

                  Published in 2013
                  Dowling P. The Impact of Climate Change on the European Energy System. ENERGY POLICY 60; 2013. p. 406-417. JRC76197

                  White Knights: Will wind and solar come to the rescue of a looming capacity gap from nuclear phase-out or slow CCS start-up? 

                  Published in 2013
                  Griffin, B., Buisson, P., Criqui, P., & Mima, S. (2013). White Knights: will wind and solar come to the rescue of a looming capacity gap from nuclear phase-out or slow CCS start-up? Climatic Change, 123(3-4), 623–635. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0963-5

                  Costs of meeting international climate targets without nuclear power 

                  Published in 2013
                  Duscha, V., Schumacher, K., Schleich, J., & Buisson, P. (2013). Costs of meeting international climate targets without nuclear power. Climate Policy, 14(3), 327–352. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.852018

                  Medium and Long-Term Perspectives of International Bioenergy Trade 

                  Published in 2013
                  Kranzl, L., Daioglou, V., Faaij, A., Junginger, M., Keramidas, K., Matzenberger, J., & Tromborg, E. (2013). Medium and Long-Term Perspectives of International Bioenergy Trade. International Bioenergy Trade, 173–189. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6982-3_8

                  The benefit from reduced energy import bills and the importance of energy prices in GHG reduction scenarios 

                  Published in 2012
                  Dowling P, Russ H. The benefit from reduced energy import bills and the importance of energy prices in GHG reduction scenarios. ENERGY ECONOMICS 34 (Supplement 3); 2012. p. 429–435. JRC68639

                  European climate-energy security nexus: A model based scenario analysis 

                  Published in 2012
                  Criqui, P., & Mima, S. (2012). European climate—energy security nexus: A model based scenario analysis. Energy Policy, 41, 827–842. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.061

                  Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies 

                  Published in 2012
                  Rafaj, P., Schöpp, W., Russ, P., Heyes, C., & Amann, M. (2012). Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18(6), 801–824. doi:10.1007/s11027-012-9390-6

                  A model-based assessment of the impact of revitalised R&D investments on the European power sector 

                  Published in 2012
                  Wiesenthal, T., Mercier, A., Schade, B., Petric, H., & Dowling, P. (2012). A model-based assessment of the impact of revitalised R&D investments on the European power sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.139

                  Climate policies for road transport revisited (II): Closing the policy gap with cap-and-trade 

                  Published in 2011
                  Flachsland, C., Brunner, S., Edenhofer, O., & Creutzig, F. (2011). Climate policies for road transport revisited (II): Closing the policy gap with cap-and-trade. Energy Policy, 39(4), 2100–2110. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.053

                  The use of scenarios as the basis for combined assessment of climate change mitigation and adaptation 

                  Published in 2011
                  Van Vuuren, D. P., Isaac, M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Arnell, N., Barker, T., Criqui, P., … Scrieciu, S. (2011). The use of scenarios as the basis for combined assessment of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 575–591. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.003

                  The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs 

                  Published in 2010
                  Edenhofer , O., Knopf, B., Barker, T., Baumstark, L., Bellevrat, E., Chateau, B., … Vuuren, D. P. van. (2010). The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs. The Energy Journal, 31(01). doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol31-nosi-2

                  Transformation Patterns of the Worldwide Energy System - Scenarios for the Century with the POLES Model 

                  Published in 2010
                  Kitous, A., Criqui, P., Bellevrat, E., & Chateau, B. (2010). Transformation Patterns of the Worldwide Energy System - Scenarios for the Century with the POLES Model. The Energy Journal, 31(01). doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol31-nosi-3

                  Bio-Energy Use and Low Stabilization Scenarios 

                  Published in 2010
                  Vuuren, D. P. van, Bellevrat, E., Kitous, A., & Isaac, M. (2010). Bio-Energy Use and Low Stabilization Scenarios. The Energy Journal, 31(01). doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol31-nosi-8

                  Economic Assessment of Post-2012 Global Climate Policies - Analysis of Gas Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 models 

                  Published in 2009
                  Russ H, Ciscar Martinez J, Saveyn B, Soria Ramirez A, Szabo L, Van Regemorter D. Economic Assessment of Post-2012 Global Climate Policies - Analysis of Gas Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 models. EUR 23768 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): European Commission; 2009. JRC50307

                  Insights on Different Participation Schemes to Meet Climate Goals 

                  Published in 2009
                  Russ H, Van Ierland T. Insights on Different Participation Schemes to Meet Climate Goals. ENERGY ECONOMICS 31 (Supplement 2); 2009. p. S163-S173. JRC56838

                  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: low-carbon electricity generation 

                  Published in 2009
                  Markandya, A., Armstrong, B. G., Hales, S., Chiabai, A., Criqui, P., Mima, S., … Wilkinson, P. (2009). Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: low-carbon electricity generation. The Lancet, 374(9706), 2006–2015. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61715-3

                  The fundamentals of the future international emissions trading system 

                  Published in 2008
                  Stankeviciute, L., Kitous, A., & Criqui, P. (2008). The fundamentals of the future international emissions trading system. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4272–4286. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.035

                  Energy and climate policies to 2020: the impacts of the European “20/20/20” approach 

                  Published in 2008
                  Stankeviciute, L., & Criqui, P. (2008). Energy and climate policies to 2020: the impacts of the European “20/20/20” approach. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2(2), 252–273. doi:10.1108/17506220810883243

                  Global Climate Policy Scenarios for 2030 and beyond - Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Pathway Scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 Models 

                  Published in 2007
                  Russ H, Wiesenthal T, Van Regemorter D, Ciscar Martinez J. Global Climate Policy Scenarios for 2030 and beyond - Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Pathway Scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 Models\r\n. EUR 23032 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): OPOCE; 2007. JRC41526

                  Post-Kyoto CO2 emission reduction: The soft landing scenario analysed with POLES and other world models 

                  Published in 2007
                  Russ, P., & Criqui, P. (2007). Post-Kyoto CO2 emission reduction: The soft landing scenario analysed with POLES and other world models. Energy Policy, 35(2), 786–796. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.010

                  World Energy Technology Outlook : WETO H2.

                  Published in 2006

                  Impacts of Multi-gas Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emission Abatement: Insights from a Partial Equilibrium Model 

                  Published in 2006
                  Criqui, P., Russ, P., & Deybe, D. (2006). Impacts of Multi-gas Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emission Abatement: Insights from a Partial Equilibrium Model. The Energy Journal, SI2006(01). doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-volsi2006-nosi3-12

                  Analysis of Post-2012 Climate Policy Scenarios with Limited Participation

                  Published in 2005
                  Russ H, Ciscar Martinez J, Szabo` L. Analysis of Post-2012 Climate Policy Scenarios with Limited Participation. EUR 21758 EN. 2005. JRC30404

                  World energy, technology and climate policy outlook 2030 : WETO.

                  Published in 2003

                  Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model 

                  Published in 1999
                  Criqui, P., Mima, S., & Viguier, L. (1999). Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model. Energy Policy, 27(10), 585–601. doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(99)00051-8

                  Peer review for model validation

                  Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals 

                  Published in 2018
                  Mccollum, D., Zhou, W., Bertram, C., De Boer, H., Bosetti, V., Busch, S., Després, J., Drouet, L., Emmerling, J., Fay, M., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Gidden, M., Harmsen, J., Huppmann, D., Iyer, G., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Nicolas, C., Pachauri, S., Parkinson, S., Poblete-Cazenave, M., Rafaj, P., Rao, N., Rozenberg, J., Schmitz, A., Schoepp, W., Van Vuuren, D. and Riahi, K., Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, NATURE ENERGY, ISSN 2058-7546, 3, 2018, p. 589-599, JRC108794.

                  Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy 

                  Published in 2015
                  Kriegler E, Riahi K, Bauer N, Schwanitz V, Petermann N, Bosetti V, Marcucci A, Otto S, Paroussos L, Rao S, Arroyo Curras T, Ashina S, Bollen J, Eom J, Hamdi-Cherif M, Longden T, Kitous A, Mejean A, Sano F, Schaeffer M, Wada K, Capros P, Van Vuuren D, Edenhofer O. Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE 90 (Part A); 2015. p. 24-44. JRC85430

                  Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy 

                  Published in 2015
                  Kriegler E, Petermann N, Krey V, Schwanitz V, Luderer G, Ashina S, Bosetti V, Eom J, Kitous A, Mejean A, Paroussos L, Sano F, Turton H, Wilson C, Van Vuuren D. Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE 90 (Part A); 2015. p. 45-61. JRC85428

                  The role of renewable energy in climate stabilization: Results from the EMF27 scenarios 

                  Published in 2013
                  Luderer, G., Krey, V., Calvin, K., Merrick, J., Mima, S., Pietzcker, R., … Wada, K. (2013). The role of renewable energy in climate stabilization: results from the EMF27 scenarios. Climatic Change, 123(3-4), 427–441. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0924-z

                  Climate impact of transportation A model comparison 

                  Published in 2013
                  Girod B, Van Vuuren D, Grahn M, Kitous A, Kim S, Kyle P. Climate impact of transportation A model comparison. CLIMATIC CHANGE 118 (3-4); 2013. p. 595-608. JRC85414

                  Model documentation

                  POLES-JRC model documentation 

                  Published in 2018
                  Després, J., Keramidas, K., Schmitz, A., Kitous, A., Schade, B., Diaz Vazquez, A., Mima, S., Russ, H. and Wiesenthal, T., POLES-JRC model documentation, EUR 29454 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, ISBN 978-92-79-97300-0 (online), doi:10.2760/814959 (online), JRC113757.

                  Other related documents

                  An integrated modelling framework for the forest-based bioeconomy 

                  Published in 2014
                  Mubareka S, Jonsson K, Rinaldi F, Fiorese G, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Sallnaes P, Baranzelli C, Pilli R, Lavalle C, Kitous A. An integrated modelling framework for the forest-based bioeconomy. IEEE Earthzine 2014 7 (2); 2014. p. 1-17. JRC90895