MAGNET

Modular Applied GeNeral Equilibrium Tool
Fact Sheet

Source: Commission modelling inventory and knowledge management system (MIDAS)

Date of Report Generation: Mon Apr 22 2024

Dissemination: Public

© European Union, 2024

The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated. You may be required to clear additional rights if a specific content depicts identifiable private individuals or includes third-party works. To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the rightholders. Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the Commission's reuse policy and are not licensed to you.

Disclaimer: The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any and all information made available on or accessible through MIDAS website. The information, including but not limited to models, impact assessments, models’ input and output data, and metadata, modelling exercises and policy contributions, is of a general nature only and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, and may not be regarded as comprehensive, complete, accurate or upto-date. The Commission furthermore does not assume any responsibility for content of any external websites to which links maybe provided on this website. Any and all information provided may not be regarded as professional or legal advice. Information available through the website may not be referenced as officially adopted text of European Union regulatory or policy documents or sources. Their authentic versions can only be accessed through the Official Journal of the European Union (the printed edition or, since 1 July 2013, the electronic edition on the EUR-Lex website).

Overview

Acronym

MAGNET

Full title

Modular Applied GeNeral Equilibrium Tool

Main purpose

A global whole-economy model used to analyse policy scenarios on agricultural economics, bioeconomy, food security, climate change and international trade. 

Summary

MAGNET is a recursive dynamic, multi-region, multi-sector Computable General Equilibrium model used to analyse policy scenarios on agricultural economics, bioeconomy, food security, climate change and international trade. It was developed by the Wageningen Economic Research (WECR) in cooperation with JRC and the Thunen Institute.

MAGNET is calibrated to the GTAP database and describes production, use and international trade flows of goods and services and primary factor use differentiated by sectors. The database distinguishes 141 countries or regions (including all EU member states), 65 sectors (plus several optional MAGNET-specific extensions) and 8 factors (e.g., labour, capital, land). A distinguishing feature of the model is its modular design which allows tailoring its structure to the research question. The GTAP model forms the MAGNET core while users choose among several extensions: different nesting structures or assumptions about factor markets, different agricultural-, trade- and biofuels-policy mechanisms and different assumptions relating to investment allocation. Other modules deal with the representation of the Common Agricultural Policies (including rural development), land and labour supply, production quotas, tariff rate quotas, biofuels directive, bioenergy policies, water in agriculture, GHG emmisions (marginal abatement curves) and tracking of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to name a few.

MAGNET can be used in policy formulation through ex-ante policy analysis. The model assesses policy scenarios related to agriculture and agri-food trade while taking into account other fields directly connected with agri-food production such-as bioeconomy (bioenergy, biofuel, biobased chemicals, …), sustainable use of resources (land and water), food security and nutrition (developing and developed countries) and climate change, but also feedback with the wider (non-agricultural) economy. Policy scenarios are compared against a baseline including the most recent macroeconomic (GDP and population) and agricultural (yields, land productivity, EU agricultural mid-term outlook) exogenous drivers. Focusing on ex-ante policy analysis, the model can be used to support policy formulation or to provide valuable information to policy makers in front of exogenous shocks.

 

Model categories

Economy

Model keywords

trade policyCAPclimate changemulti-commodity modelbaselinebioeconomyagricultural economic modelFood Securityrecursive-dynamicSustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Model homepage

http://www.magnet-model.org/

Ownership and Licence

Ownership

Co-ownership (EU & third parties)

Ownership details

The MAGNET consortium, led by Wageningen Economic Research which is part of Wageningen University and Research, includes the Economics of Agriculture unit of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC.D4) and the Thünen-Institute (TI).

Licence type

Non-Free Software licence

The license has one or more of the following restrictions: it prohibits creation of derivative works; it prohibits commercial use; it obliges to share the licensed or derivative works on the same conditions.

Details

Structure and approach

The Modular Agricultural GeNeral Equilibrium Tool (MAGNET) is a multi-region computable general equilibrium model which is a derivative of the well-known Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model. It is developed and applied at Wageningen Economic Research (WECR) at  Wageningen University and Research (WUR) and is also employed by the Thünen Institute (TI) and the Joint Research Centre (JRC/D).

MAGNET is calibrated to the latest version of the GTAP database which describes production, use and international trade flows of goods and services, as well as primary factor use differentiated by sectors. The GTAP database distinguishes 141 countries or regions (among them the 27 EU member states), 65 sectors and 8 factor endowments. It is based on country input-output tables and includes consistent bilateral trade flows, transport and protection data. Additional datasets are used for specific MAGNET modules, among them data coming from the International Energy Agency (IEA), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Clearance Audit Trail System (CATS) database for CAP analysis. The choice of regions and sectors from the database can be flexibly aggregated to set-up specific model versions.

MAGNET consists of a system of three types of equations. Firstly, 'behavioural equations' employing 'convenient' mathematical functions represent, under conditions of constrained optimisation, the theoretical tenets of neoclassical economic demand and supply. Subject to a series of 'market clearing' (i.e., supply equals demand) and 'accounting' equations (i.e., income equals expenditure equals output; zero 'economic' profits) consistent with the underlying accounting conventions of the database, the model enforces 'equilibrium'. To solve the model, the number of equations and (endogenous) variables within the system must be the same (known as the model 'closure'). Additional variables under the direct control of the modeller (defined as 'exogenous'), which capture market imperfections (tax rates), factor endowments or technological change, can be manipulated or 'shocked', whereupon the model finds a new matrix of prices and quantities to arrive at a post-shock equilibrium subject to the aforementioned accounting and market clearing restrictions.

A key strength of the MAGNET model is that it allows the user to choose a la carte those sub-modules of relevance to a specific study. The user can (inter alia) choose between different nesting structures, apply different assumptions about the workings of the factor markets, include different agricultural-, trade- and biofuels-policy mechanisms and incorporate dynamic assumptions relating to investment allocation over time periods.

To characterise the peculiarities of agricultural markets, the model accounts for the heterogeneity of land usage by agricultural activity; a regional endogenous land supply function; the sluggish mobility of capital and labour transfer between agricultural and non-agricultural sectors with associated wage and rent differentials; the inclusion of explicit substitution possibilities between different feed inputs in the livestock sectors; and additional behavioural and accounting equations to characterise EU agricultural policy mechanisms (e.g., production quotas, single farm payment, coupled payments, rural development measures). For the CAP module, additional coupled and decoupled policy variables are included to allow or a finer representation of CAP policy shocks. Furthermore, a detailed set of CAP policy payments, taken from the Clearance of Accounts Audit Trail System (CATS) database (DG AGRI) are used as a basis for calculating ‘CAP reference scenario’ shocks. In addition, an ‘own-resources’ module is included within the CAP budget accounting equations. Further modelling enhancements are incorporated including of ‘first’ and ‘second’ generation biofuels, GHG emission, water indicators. Other modules include treatment of waste, enhancement of labour market, fishery, inclusion of other climate policies and damage function and a specific module on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicators.

The results of the MAGNET model are typically presented in value terms or in price and quantity percentage changes. The MAGNET model compiles a large number of indicators, in particular related to production, trade flows, consumption, use of endowments, intermediate input use, income and price changes, land use, emissions, employment. As an additional tool of analysis, this study draws on the GEMPACK decomposition method. On running a complex scenario with an array of shocks (i.e., endowments, tariffs, technology change etc.), it is possible to calculate the part-worth of the resulting endogenous variable change that corresponds to a specific exogenous shock, or pre-specified group of exogenous shocks. Thus, when comparing each of the scenarios with the reference scenario, the comparative ‘part-worth’ importance of each of the policy indicators is evaluated in order to better understand the role that policy has to play (if any) in shaping bio-based market trends.

Input and parametrization

Te key inputs used for the model:

  • Value of Margins on international trade (GTAP database)
  • Value of Bilateral imports and exports (GTAP database)
  • Value of Intermediate and production factors use by industries (GTAP database)
  • Value of commodity outputs (GTAP database)
  • Value of Capital stock (GTAP database)
  • Value of Tax revenues (GTAP database)
  • Ad-valorem rate of several tax instruments (GTAP database)
  • Income elasticities (GTAP database)
  • Armington elasticities (GTAP database)
  • Production elasticities (GTAP database)
  • EU Agricultural Production and net trade (DG AGRI Agricultural Outlook)
  • GHG emission for the (EU Reference Scenario 2016 on energy, transport and climate action; GECO)
  • Land supply (FAOSTAT)
  • CAP payments (CATS database)
  • GDP and population projections (various sources)

The use of MAGNET requires, at a minimum, an understanding of the standard GTAP model and an ability to read GEMPACK code.

Main output

  • Macroeconomic variables (GDP, welfare, value added, savings-investments, current account, world prices)
  • Sectorial indicators (production, consumption, prices, bilateral trade)
  • Production factors (employment, wage, land use and price, capital)
  • Additional indicators tailored on the study (water, bioenergy, biofuel, …)
  • Nutrition indicators
  • Food security indicators (availability, access, utilisation)
  • GHG indicators (CO2, Non-CO2)
  • Sustainable Development Goals Indicators

MAGNET analyses the economy-wide and distributional impacts of policy and/or structural shocks, sectoral transmission of sector-specific policies for sectors, agents and regions. The output of MAGNET includes projections of input-output tables, GDP, employment, bilateral trade, capital flows and household consumption. The explicit formulation of representative households allows the derivation of welfare indicators.

Spatial & Temporal extent

The output has the following spatial-temporal resolution and extent:

ParameterDescription
Spatial extent / country coverageALL countries of the WORLD
Spatial resolutionWorld-regions (supranational)National
Temporal extentShort-term (from 1 to 5 years)Medium-term (5 to 15 years)Long-term (more than 15 years)
Baseyear 2014, can run in time step up to 2100.
Temporal resolutionYears
To be selected by the modellers, minimum 1 year.

Quality & Transparency

Quality

Model uncertainties

Models are by definition affected by uncertainties (in input data, input parameters, scenario definitions, etc.). Have the model uncertainties been quantified? Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?

yes
Partially. Uncertainty analyses are performed with regard to data, parametrs and exogneous assumptions to the aim of the specific research question. MAGNET is unique as it is able to perform sensitivity analyses with regard to model structure due it modular set up. Many scientific paper include uncertainty analyses directed at research question.

    Sensitivity analysis

    Sensitivity analysis helps identifying the uncertain inputs mostly responsible for the uncertainty in the model responses. Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?

    yes
    Partially. Not accounted for systematically, but most relevant ones tested via additional simulations. Sensitivity analyses are performed with regard to data, parametrs and exogneous assumptions to the aim of the specific research question. MAGNET is unique as it is able to perform sensitivity analyses with regard to model structure due to its modular set up. Many scientific papers include sensitivity analyses.

      Have model results been published in peer-reviewed articles?

      yes
      Scenarios to account mainly sensitivity are usually added to main analyses. Results published on regular basis in (high impact) journals such as Nature, Nature Climate Change, Nature Communications, Environmental Research Letter, Agricultural Economics.

        Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?

        Please note that this does not refer to the cases when model results were validated by stakeholders.

        no

          Model validation

          Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?

          no
          There has been no formal evaluation of the model by an external panel, however the model has been extensively published in peer-reviewed journals and is widely regarded as state-of-the-art global Computable General Equilibrium of agricultural and bioeconomy analysis.

            Transparency

            To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?

            This may include sources accessible upon subscription and/or payment

            Entirely based on publicly available sources

            Is the full model database as such available to external users?

            Whether or not it implies a specific procedure or a fee

            yes

            Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?

            Note this excludes IA reports.

            yes

            Have output datasets been made publicly available?

            Note this could also imply a specific procedure or a fee.

            yes
            Through publications in reports and journals, as well as in the data platform dataM.

              Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?

              For instance: Dashboard, interactive interfaces...

              yes

              Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?

              Note this excludes IA reports.

              yes
              See model documentation, Woltjer G., Kuiper M., Kavallari, A., van Meijl, H., Powell, J., Rutten, M., Shutes, L., Tabeau, A. (2014). The MAGNET model - Module description. Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), LEI Report 14-057. The Hague, Netherlands.

              Is there a dedicated public website where information about the model is provided?

              yes

                Is the model code open-source?

                no

                Can the code be accessed upon request?

                no

                The model’s policy relevance and intended role in the policy cycle

                The model is designed to contribute to the following policy areas

                • Agriculture and rural development
                • Economy, finance and the euro
                • Energy
                • Environment
                • Regional policy

                The model is designed to contribute to the following phases of the policy cycle

                • Formulation – such as ex-ante Impact Assessments

                The model’s potential

                This economic simulation model, as a contribution to this impact assessment process, can provide insights into the effects of different policy scenarios on international trade and competitiveness.

                The model is designed to conduct policy experiments, in which a reference scenario or baseline is first simulated over a future period and then, after changing one or more underlying assumptions (all kind of police instruments, tax, tariffs...), a new scenario incorporating these changes is run, also over the same time period. Comparison of the new scenario with the reference scenario at a given point in the simulation period, usually in terms of percentage differences, establishes the direction and relative magnitude of the impacts on all the endogenous variables of the change that is depicted in the hypothetical scenario at that point in time.

                Previous use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments of the European Commission

                Use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments since July 2017.

                2023
                SWD/2023/421 final

                Impact Assessment accompanying the document Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste

                Lead by
                ENV
                Run by
                European Commission
                Contribution role
                baseline and assessment of policy options
                Contribution details

                The study utilizes the further adapted computable general equilibrium model MAGNET and employs a range of sustainability indicators to analyse the economic, social, and environmental impacts associated with the reduction of food waste for the different policy options.

                2018
                SWD/2018/301 final

                Impact assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Communication: on modernising and simplifying the common agricultural policy

                Lead by
                AGRI
                Run by
                European Commission
                Contribution role
                baseline and assessment of policy options
                Contribution details

                The model helped to assess the following impacts:

                • Affects on individual Member States
                • EU Exports & imports
                • Non-trade barriers
                • Cost of doing business
                • Market share & advantages in international context
                • Stimulation of research and development
                • Prices, quality, availability or choice of consumer goods and services
                • Significant effects on sectors
                • Disproportionately affected region or sector
                • International legal commitments
                • EU foreign policy and EU development policy
                • Impacts on third countries
                • Impacts on developing countries
                • Goods traded with developing countries
                • Impact on jobs
                • Impact on jobs in specific sectors, professions, regions or countries
                • Indirect effects on employment levels
                • Factors preventing or enhancing the potential to create jobs or prevent job losses
                • Wages, labour costs or wage setting mechanisms
                • Households income and at risk of poverty rates
                • Inequalities and the distribution of incomes and wealth
                • Emission of greenhouse gases
                • Waste production, treatment, disposal or recycling
                • Sustainable production and consumption
                • Environment in third countries
                • Change in land use

                Bibliographic references

                Studies that uses the model or its results

                How food secure are the green, rocky and middle roads: food security effects in different world development paths 

                Published in 2020
                Van Meijl, H., Tabeau, A., Stehfest, E., Doelman, J., & Lucas, P. (2020). How food secure are the green, rocky and middle roads: food security effects in different world development paths. Environmental Research Communications, 2(3), 031002. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ab7aba

                Labor supply assumptions - A missing link in food security projections 

                Published in 2020
                Kuiper, M., Shutes, L., van Meijl, H., Oudendag, D., & Tabeau, A. (2020). Labor supply assumptions - A missing link in food security projections. Global Food Security, 25, 100328. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100328

                Modelling alternative futures of global food security: Insights from FOODSECURE 

                Published in 2020
                Van Meijl, H., Shutes, L., Valin, H., Stehfest, E., van Dijk, M., Kuiper, M., … Havlik, P. (2020). Modelling alternative futures of global food security: Insights from FOODSECURE. Global Food Security, 25, 100358. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100358

                Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy 

                Published in 2020
                Leclère, D., Obersteiner, M., Barrett, M., Butchart, S. H. M., Chaudhary, A., De Palma, A., … Dürauer, M. (2020). Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature, 585(7826), 551–556. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2705-y

                Snakes and ladders: World development pathways' synergies and trade-offs through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals 

                Published in 2020
                Philippidis, G., Shutes, L., M`barek, R., Ronzon, T., Tabeau, A. and Van Meijl, H., Snakes and ladders: World development pathways` synergies and trade-offs through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals, JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, ISSN 0959-6526 (online), 267, 2020, p. 122147, JRC120499.

                Key determinants of global land-use projections 

                Published in 2019
                Stehfest, E., van Zeist, W.-J., Valin, H., Havlik, P., Popp, A., Kyle, P., … Wiebe, K. (2019). Key determinants of global land-use projections. Nature Communications, 10(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09945-w

                Alternative global transition pathways to 2050: Prospects for the bioeconomy  

                Published in 2019
                M`barek, R., Philippidis, G. and Ronzon, T., Alternative global transition pathways to 2050: Prospects for the bioeconomy, EUR 29862 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, ISBN 978-92-76-11335-5 (online),978-92-76-11334-8 (print), doi:10.2760/594847 (online),10.2760/686127 (print), JRC118064.

                Waste not, want not: A bio-economic impact assessment of household food waste reductions in the EU 

                Published in 2019
                Philippidis, G., Sartori, M., Ferrari, E., & M’Barek, R. (2019). Waste not, want not: A bio-economic impact assessment of household food waste reductions in the EU. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 514–522. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.016

                A linkage between the biophysical and the economic: Assessing the global market impacts of soil erosion 

                Published in 2019
                Sartori, M., Philippidis, G., Ferrari, E., Borrelli, P., Lugato, E., Montanarella, L., & Panagos, P. (2019). A linkage between the biophysical and the economic: Assessing the global market impacts of soil erosion. Land Use Policy, 86, 299–312. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.014

                Healthy Diets and Reduced Land Pressure: Towards a Double Gain for Future Food Systems in Nigeria 

                Published in 2019
                Smeets-Kristkova, Z., Achterbosch, T., & Kuiper, M. (2019). Healthy Diets and Reduced Land Pressure: Towards a Double Gain for Future Food Systems in Nigeria. Sustainability, 11(3), 835. doi:10.3390/su11030835

                Making the Paris agreement climate targets consistent with food security objectives 

                Published in 2019
                Doelman, J. C., Stehfest, E., Tabeau, A., & van Meijl, H. (2019). Making the Paris agreement climate targets consistent with food security objectives. Global Food Security, 23, 93–103. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.04.003

                The vulnerabilities of agricultural land and food production to future water scarcity 

                Published in 2019
                Fitton, N., Alexander, P., Arnell, N., Bajzelj, B., Calvin, K., Doelman, J., … Smith, P. (2019). The vulnerabilities of agricultural land and food production to future water scarcity. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101944. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101944

                Levelling the playing field for EU biomass usage 

                Published in 2019
                Philippidis, G., Bartelings, H., Helming, J., M’barek, R., Smeets, E., & van Meijl, H. (2019). Levelling the playing field for EU biomass usage. Economic Systems Research, 31(2), 158–177. doi:10.1080/09535314.2018.1564020

                The MAGNET model framework for assessing policy coherence and SDGs: Application to the bioeconomy 

                Published in 2018
                Philippidis, G., Bartelings, H., Helming, J., M`barek, R., Ronzon, T., Smeets, E., Van Meijl, H. and Shutes, L., The MAGNET model framework for assessing policy coherence and SDGs: Application to the bioeconomy, EUR 29188 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, ISBN 978-92-79-81792-2, doi:10.2760/560977, JRC111508.

                The Good, the bad and the uncertain: Bioenergy use in the European Union 

                Published in 2018
                Philippidis, G., Bartelings, H., Helming, J., M`barek, R., Smeets, E. and Van Meijl, H., The Good, the bad and the uncertain: Bioenergy use in the European Union, ENERGIES, ISSN 1996-1073 (online), 11 (10), 2018, p. 2703, JRC112585.

                On the macro-economic impact of bioenergy and biochemicals – Introducing advanced bioeconomy sectors into an economic modelling framework with a case study for the Netherlands 

                Published in 2018
                Van Meijl, H., Tsiropoulos, I., Bartelings, H., Hoefnagels, R., Smeets, E., Tabeau, A., & Faaij, A. (2018). On the macro-economic impact of bioenergy and biochemicals – Introducing advanced bioeconomy sectors into an economic modelling framework with a case study for the Netherlands. Biomass and Bioenergy, 108, 381–397. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.040

                Scenar 2030 - Pathways for the European agriculture and food sector beyond 2020 

                Published in 2017
                M`barek, R., Barreiro Hurle, J., Boulanger, P., Caivano, A., Ciaian, P., Dudu, H., Espinosa Goded, M., Fellmann, T., Ferrari, E., Gomez Y Paloma, S., Gorrin Gonzalez, C., Himics, M., Elouhichi, K., Perni Llorente, A., Philippidis, G., Salputra, G., Witzke, H. and Genovese, G., Scenar 2030 - Pathways for the European agriculture and food sector beyond 2020, EUR 28797 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79-73859-3, doi:10.2760/887521, JRC108449.

                The impact of R&D on factor-augmenting technical change – an empirical assessment at the sector level 

                Published in 2017
                Smeets Kristkova, Z., Gardebroek, C., van Dijk, M., & van Meijl, H. (2017). The impact of R&D on factor-augmenting technical change – an empirical assessment at the sector level. Economic Systems Research, 29(3), 385–417. doi:10.1080/09535314.2017.1316707

                Drivers of the European Bioeconomy in Transition (BioEconomy2030) - an exploratory, model-based assessment  

                Published in 2016
                Philippidis G, M`barek R, Ferrari E. Drivers of the European Bioeconomy in Transition (BioEconomy2030) - an exploratory, model-based assessment . EUR 27563. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. JRC98160

                Is ‘Bio-Based’ Activity a Panacea for Sustainable Competitive Growth? 

                Published in 2016
                Philippidis, G., M’barek, R., & Ferrari, E. (2016). Is “Bio-Based” Activity a Panacea for Sustainable Competitive Growth? Energies, 9(10), 806. doi:10.3390/en9100806

                Cumulative economic impact of future trade agreements on EU agriculture 

                Published in 2016
                Boulanger P; Dudu H; Ferrari E; Himics M; M`barek R. Cumulative economic impact of future trade agreements on EU agriculture. EUR 28206 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. JRC103602

                Observing and analysing the Bioeconomy in the EU - Adapting data and tools to new questions and challenges 

                Published in 2014
                M`Barek R, Philippidis G, Suta C, Vinyes Pinto C, Caivano A, Ferrari E, Ronzon T, Sanjuan Lopez A, Santini F. Observing and analysing the Bioeconomy in the EU - Adapting data and tools to new questions and challenges . Bio-based and Applied Economics 3 (1); 2014. p. 83-91. JRC89423

                Commodity Market Development in Europe – Outlook. Proceedings of the October 2013 Workshop 

                Published in 2014
                Fellmann T, Santini F. Commodity Market Development in Europe – Outlook. Proceedings of the October 2013 Workshop. EUR 26600. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2014. JRC85607

                The impact of the rebound effect of the use of first generation biofuels in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions: A critical review 

                Published in 2014
                Smeets, E., Tabeau, A., van Berkum, S., Moorad, J., van Meijl, H., & Woltjer, G. (2014). The impact of the rebound effect of the use of first generation biofuels in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 393–403. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.035

                Modelling the Common Agricultural Policy with the Modular Agricultural GeNeral Equilibrium Tool (MAGNET). Effects of the 2014-2020 CAP financial agreement on welfare, trade, factor and product markets  

                Published in 2014
                Boulanger P, Philippidis G. Modelling the Common Agricultural Policy with the Modular Agricultural GeNeral Equilibrium Tool (MAGNET). Effects of the 2014-2020 CAP financial agreement on welfare, trade, factor and product markets . EUR 26835. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2014. JRC85874

                Analysis of the impact of Croatia's accession to the EU on the agri-food sectors. A focus on trade and agricultural policies. 

                Published in 2013
                Boulanger P, Ferrari E, Michalek J, Vinyes Pinto C. Analysis of the impact of Croatia`s accession to the EU on the agri-food sectors. A focus on trade and agricultural policies.. EUR 25835. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2013. JRC77246

                Sit down at the ball game: How trade barriers make the world less food secure 

                Published in 2013
                Rutten, M., Shutes, L., & Meijerink, G. (2013). Sit down at the ball game: How trade barriers make the world less food secure. Food Policy, 38, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.09.002

                Simulating long-term effects of policies in the agri-food sector: requirements, challenges and recommendations 

                Published in 2013
                Tonini A, Michalek J, Fellmann T, M`Barek R, Delince J, Philippidis G, editors. Simulating long-term effects of policies in the agri-food sector: requirements, challenges and recommendations. EUR 26253. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2013. JRC84850

                Peer review for model validation

                Exploring economy-wide sustainable conditions for EU bio-chemical activities 

                Published in 2023
                Philippidis, G., M`barek, R., Boysen-Urban, K. and Van Zeist, W., Exploring economy-wide sustainable conditions for EU bio-chemical activities, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, ISSN 0921-8009 (online), 210, 2023, p. 107857, JRC128961.

                Eating your greens: a global sustainability assessment 

                Published in 2021
                Philippidis, G., Ferrer-Pérez, H., Gracia-de-Rentería, P., M’barek, R., & Sanjuán López, A. I. (2021). Eating your greens: a global sustainability assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168, 105460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105460

                Model documentation

                No references in this category

                Other related documents

                Reply to: An appeal to cost undermines food security risks of delayed mitigation 

                Published in 2020
                Hasegawa, T., Fujimori, S., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Bodirsky, B. L., Doelman, J. C., … Witzke, P. (2020). Reply to: An appeal to cost undermines food security risks of delayed mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 420–421. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0767-3