G4M

Global Forest Model
Fact Sheet

Source: Commission modelling inventory and knowledge management system (MIDAS)

Date of Report Generation: Mon Apr 22 2024

Dissemination: Public

© European Union, 2024

The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated. You may be required to clear additional rights if a specific content depicts identifiable private individuals or includes third-party works. To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the rightholders. Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the Commission's reuse policy and are not licensed to you.

Disclaimer: The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any and all information made available on or accessible through MIDAS website. The information, including but not limited to models, impact assessments, models’ input and output data, and metadata, modelling exercises and policy contributions, is of a general nature only and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, and may not be regarded as comprehensive, complete, accurate or upto-date. The Commission furthermore does not assume any responsibility for content of any external websites to which links maybe provided on this website. Any and all information provided may not be regarded as professional or legal advice. Information available through the website may not be referenced as officially adopted text of European Union regulatory or policy documents or sources. Their authentic versions can only be accessed through the Official Journal of the European Union (the printed edition or, since 1 July 2013, the electronic edition on the EUR-Lex website).

Overview

Acronym

G4M

Full title

Global Forest Model

Main purpose

G4M is a global forestry and land-use change model. The model is spatially explicit (0.5x0.5 deg. grid), it evaluates the potential income from forest and alternative land uses, and assesses impacts of carbon sequestration policies.

Summary

G4M was developed at International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in the mid-2000s for modelling afforestation in Latin America under the name of DIMA. Over time, it evolved to a global land use change and forestry scenario analysis framework. G4M operates on regular 0.5x0.5 degree grid. The model uses input data on the grid, country and world region scales. The results can be output on the grid, country or regional scales as well. There are two branches of the model – global and European. The European branch uses additional spatial data on tree species and wood production, species-specific biomass expansion factors, age structure, and other country specific data. The global model usually is solved using 5-year time step while the European model applies 1-year step, the time span is from 1990 (2000) up to 2100.

The G4M model computes and compares the income derived from forests with the income that could be derived from an alternative use of the same land, for example, to grow grain for food or biofuel. To do this, G4M computes the amount of the net income currently being derived from forests by calculating the amount and value of wood produced minus the harvesting costs (i.e., logging and timber extraction), and estimates the potential income from the carbon storage in forests (sequestration). Taking these values into account, G4M allows to assess whether it would be more profitable to grow agricultural crops or bioenergy crops, or whether forestry is the best option for the land use.

G4M can be used for ex-ante impact assessments. It produces estimates of the forest area change, carbon sequestration and emissions in forests, impacts of carbon incentives (e.g. avoided deforestation, stimulated afforestation, and forest management aimed at production of demanded amount of wood and enhancing carbon storage in forest biomass at the same time) and supply of biomass for bio-energy and timber.

Model categories

ClimateEconomyEnvironmentΟtherEnergy

Model keywords

land use changeforestry

Model homepage

http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/modelsData/G4M.en.html

Ownership and Licence

Ownership

Third-party ownership (commercial companies, Member States, other organisations)

Ownership details

G4M was developed and is maintained and updated at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Licence type

Non-Free Software licence

The license has one or more of the following restrictions: it prohibits creation of derivative works; it prohibits commercial use; it obliges to share the licensed or derivative works on the same conditions.

Details

Structure and approach

The G4M model is composed of four parts: environmental (natural conditions and forest parameters; the model incorporates empirical forest growth functions – generic in global case and for major tree species in case of EU); economic (estimation of local - cell specific - wood and agricultural land prices, net present value (NPV) of forestry and agriculture, forest harvesting and planting costs); decision making (decisions on forest management parameters and the land use change); and CO2 emission estimation.

The model consists of six major modules: virtual forest, forest initialisation, forest management decisions, land use change decisions, forest dynamics and GUI output. The virtual forest module simulates forest growth and management on a forest scale. This module describes forest in terms of the stem wood dynamics. It consists of two parts: an increment function and a forest age cohort simulator. The forest initialisation module is run only once at the beginning. The module creates two types of virtual forest in each cell (forest existing in the year 2000 (named “old forest”) and forest that has been planted after 2000 (named “new forest”) and sets initial parameters of forests according to observed values. The forest management decisions module is run every year to adjust the forest rotation length and thinning to match the wood demand and residues demand on a country or global world region scale taking into account carbon sequestration policies. The land use change decisions module is run every year to estimate the NPV of forestry and agriculture in order to set the cell to one of the three states – afforest/deforest/no change, and estimate the rates of afforestation and deforestation. The forest dynamics module applies forest management and land use change with estimated parameters to virtual forests: afforestation adds new forest to the “new forest”, deforestation decreases the area of “old forest” while the forest management affects both types of forests. The module also estimates CO2 emissions relative to afforestation, deforestation and forest management. In particular, the land use change emissions are estimated for the above and belowground biomass, dead organic matter, (mineral) soil and peat; the forest management emissions are estimated for the above and belowground biomass, and deadwood, and soil emissions due to residue extraction. The GUI output module forms geographic maps, country and global world region aggregated tables in a binary format that can be viewed with special software or extracted to csv format.

By executing the six modules, the G4M model estimates the annual above ground wood increment and harvesting costs, where increment is determined by a potential Net Primary Productivity (NPP) map and translated into the net annual increment (NAI). The increment map can be either static or with a dynamic growth component which reacts to changes in temperature, precipitation or CO2 concentration. The age structure and stocking degree are used for adjusting the NAI. By comparing the income from the managed forest (difference of wood price and harvesting costs, income by storing carbon in forests) with the income from alternative land uses of the same land, a decision of afforestation or deforestation can be made. The main forest management options considered by G4M are species selection, variation of thinning and choice of rotation length. The rotation length can be individually chosen, though also the model itself can endogenously compute optimal rotation lengths to maximise increment, stocking biomass or harvestable biomass.

Input and parametrization

To model forest growth, the G4M requires static net primary production (NPP) data. The model can apply a dynamic NPP model to simulate how growth rates are affected by changes in temperature, precipitation, radiation, or CO2 concentrations.

G4M also uses information from other models or databases, for example:

  • wood prices on country or regional scale (GLOBIOM)
  • agriculture land prices on country or regional scale (GLOBIOM)
  • wood demand on country or regional scale (GLOBIOM)
  • harvest residues demand on country or regional scale (GLOBIOM)
  • spatially explicit data on prescribed demand for agriculture land from (GLOBIOM)
  • population and GDP development scenarios on country scale or spatially explicit (e.g., IIASA Scenario Database)

to produce forecasts of land-use change, carbon sequestration and/or emissions in forests, the impacts of carbon incentives (e.g., avoided deforestation), and supply of biomass for bio-energy and timber. 

G4M can use parameters based on a country’s own statistics to check their accuracy, for example

  • forest cover,
  • tree species composition,
  • age class distribution, and
  • live biomass.   

Main output

G4M produces estimates of the:

  • forest area change,
  • carbon sequestration and emissions in forests,
  • emissions from land use change (afforestation and deforestation)
  • impacts of carbon incentives (e.g. avoided deforestation, stimulated afforestation, improvements in forest management) and
  • supply of biomass for bio-energy and timber. 

The model can incorporate many factors or needs, for instance, the need to provide food security, to increase biodiversity, to understand future urbanization patterns, and to gauge how wildfires or insects might affect forest productivity.

Spatial & Temporal extent

The output has the following spatial-temporal resolution and extent:

ParameterDescription
Spatial extent / country coverageEU Member states 27ALL countries of the WORLD
Spatial resolutionWorld-regions (supranational)NationalRegular Grid >50km
Maps, aggregates by countries and global world regions at a 50 x 50 km grid level
Temporal extentLong-term (more than 15 years)
2100
Temporal resolutionYears
1 year for the European branch and 5 years for the global branch

Quality & Transparency

Quality

Model uncertainties

Models are by definition affected by uncertainties (in input data, input parameters, scenario definitions, etc.). Have the model uncertainties been quantified? Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?

yes
Sensitivity analysis for some parameters as well as comparison with other models have been done.

    Sensitivity analysis

    Sensitivity analysis helps identifying the uncertain inputs mostly responsible for the uncertainty in the model responses. Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?

    yes
    Analysis of the model sensitivity to variation of important model parameters has been done.

      Have model results been published in peer-reviewed articles?

      yes
      Model analyses are published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

        Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?

        Please note that this does not refer to the cases when model results were validated by stakeholders.

        no

          Model validation

          Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?

          yes
          The first 30 years of a scenario are usually used for validation purpose (base year is 1990)

            Transparency

            To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?

            This may include sources accessible upon subscription and/or payment

            Based on both publicly available and restricted-access sources

            Is the full model database as such available to external users?

            Whether or not it implies a specific procedure or a fee

            no
            Most input data are from public databases (e.g., FAO FRA, FAOSTAT, Forest Europe) or published in scientific journals, except the data obtained from linked models.

              Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?

              Note this excludes IA reports.

              yes

              For details please refer to the 'peer review for model validation' documents in the bibliographic references

              Have output datasets been made publicly available?

              Note this could also imply a specific procedure or a fee.

              yes
              Selected model outputs are made publicly available. Published outputs are defined by the Commission and are project-specific.

                Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?

                For instance: Dashboard, interactive interfaces...

                no

                  Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?

                  Note this excludes IA reports.

                  yes

                  Is there a dedicated public website where information about the model is provided?

                  Is the model code open-source?

                  no

                  Can the code be accessed upon request?

                  no

                  The model’s policy relevance and intended role in the policy cycle

                  The model is designed to contribute to the following policy areas

                  • Climate action
                  • Energy
                  • Environment

                  The model is designed to contribute to the following phases of the policy cycle

                  • Anticipation – such as foresight and horizon scanning
                  • Formulation – such as ex-ante Impact Assessments

                  The model’s potential

                  G4M can assess impacts of the land use and land use change and forestry (LULUCF) on climate change mitigation.

                  G4M can contribute by greenhouse gas emission calculations from different land uses to the Energy Reference Scenario of the EC (Energy Roadmap 2050), to emission trading schemes, to the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) (an important question to be resolved under the UNFCCC) etc.

                  Previous use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments of the European Commission

                  Use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments since July 2017.

                  2024
                  SWD/2024/63 final

                  Impact Assessment Report Part 1 Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Securing our future Europe's 2040 climate target and path to climate neutrality by 2050 building a sustainable, just and prosperous society

                  Lead by
                  CLIMA
                  Run by
                  International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
                  Contribution role
                  baseline and assessment of policy options
                  Contribution details

                  The GLOBIOM/G4M model-suite (called “GLOBIOM” in this impact assessment) was used to cover all LULUCF-related GHG emissions in this impact assessment, biomass supply for bioenergy, and aspects of biodiversity.

                  2022
                  SWD/2022/377 final

                  Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals

                  Lead by
                  CLIMA
                  Run by
                  International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
                  Contribution role
                  baseline and assessment of policy options
                  Contribution details

                  This impact assessment used the results from the model run for impact assessment SWD/2021/609 final regarding 'Land use, land use change & forestry – review of EU rules' (LULUCF)

                  2021
                  SWD/2021/609 final

                  Impact assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council: amending Regulations (EU) 2018/841 as regards the scope, simplifying the compliance rules, setting out the targets of the Member States for 2030 and committing to the collective achievement of climate neutrality by 2035 in the land use, forestry and agriculture sector, and (EU) 2018/1999 as regards improvement in monitoring, reporting, tracking of progress and review

                  Lead by
                  CLIMA
                  Run by
                  International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
                  Contribution role
                  baseline and assessment of policy options
                  Contribution details

                  The model helped to assess the following impacts:

                  • Affects on individual Member States
                  • EU Exports & imports
                  • Market share & advantages in international context
                  • Consumer's ability to benefit from the internal market or to access goods and services from outside the EU
                  • Prices, quality, availability or choice of consumer goods and services
                  • Significant effects on sectors
                  • Impact on regions
                  • Disproportionately affected region or sector
                  • Indirect effects on employment levels
                  • Emission of greenhouse gases
                  • Ability to adapt to climate change
                  • Available soil
                  • Use of renewable resources
                  • Fuel mix used in energy production
                  • First time use of new areas of land
                  • Change in land use

                  2020
                  SWD/2020/176 final

                  Impact Assessment accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition Investing in a climate-neutral future for the benefit of our people

                  Lead by
                  CLIMA
                  Run by
                  International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
                  Contribution role
                  baseline and assessment of policy options
                  Contribution details

                  G4M was used to model land use change, and forestry.

                  Bibliographic references

                  Studies that uses the model or its results

                  No references in this category

                  Peer review for model validation

                  A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication 

                  Published in 2021
                  Fekete, H., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., Elzen, M. den, Forsell, N., Höhne, N., Luna, L., Hans, F., Sterl, S., Olivier, J., van Soest, H., Frank, S., & Gusti, M. (2021). A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110602

                  Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress 

                  Published in 2021
                  Grassi, G., Stehfest, E., Rogelj, J., van Vuuren, D., Cescatti, A., House, J., Nabuurs, G.-J., Rossi, S., Alkama, R., Viñas, R. A., Calvin, K., Ceccherini, G., Federici, S., Fujimori, S., Gusti, M., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., Korosuo, A., … Popp, A. (2021). Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6

                  Land-based implications of early climate actions without global net-negative emissions 

                  Published in 2021
                  Hasegawa, T., Fujimori, S., Frank, S., Humpenöder, F., Bertram, C., Després, J., Drouet, L., Emmerling, J., Gusti, M., Harmsen, M., Keramidas, K., Ochi, Y., Oshiro, K., Rochedo, P., van Ruijven, B., Cabardos, A.-M., Deppermann, A., Fosse, F., Havlik, P., … Riahi, K. (2021). Land-based implications of early climate actions without global net-negative emissions. Nature Sustainability, 4(12), 1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00772-w

                  Cost and attainability of meeting stringent climate targets without overshoot 

                  Published in 2021
                  Riahi, K., Bertram, C., Huppmann, D., Rogelj, J., Bosetti, V., Cabardos, A.-M., Deppermann, A., Drouet, L., Frank, S., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Harmsen, M., Hasegawa, T., Krey, V., Luderer, G., Paroussos, L., Schaeffer, R., Weitzel, M., van der Zwaan, B., … Zakeri, B. (2021). Cost and attainability of meeting stringent climate targets without overshoot. Nature Climate Change, 11(12), 1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01215-2

                  Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world 

                  Published in 2019
                  Roe, S., Streck, C., Obersteiner, M., Frank, S., Griscom, B., Drouet, L., Fricko, O., Gusti, M., Harris, N., Hasegawa, T., Hausfather, Z., Havlík, P., House, J., Nabuurs, G.-J., Popp, A., Sánchez, M. J. S., Sanderman, J., Smith, P., Stehfest, E., & Lawrence, D. (2019). Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nature Climate Change, 9(11), 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9

                  The sensitivity of the costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) to future socioeconomic drivers and its implications for mitigation policy design 

                  Published in 2018
                  Gusti, M., Forsell, N., Havlik, P., Khabarov, N., Kraxner, F., & Obersteiner, M. (2018). The sensitivity of the costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) to future socioeconomic drivers and its implications for mitigation policy design. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 24(6), 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9817-9

                  Model documentation

                  Land-based climate change mitigation potentials within the agenda for sustainable development 

                  Published in 2021
                  Frank, S., Gusti, M., Havlík, P., Lauri, P., DiFulvio, F., Forsell, N., … Valin, H. (2021). Land-based climate change mitigation potentials within the agenda for sustainable development. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024006. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abc58a

                  The Effect of Alternative Forest Management Models on the Forest Harvest and Emissions as Compared to the Forest Reference Level 

                  Published in 2020
                  Gusti, M., Di Fulvio, F., Biber, P., Korosuo, A., & Forsell, N. (2020). The Effect of Alternative Forest Management Models on the Forest Harvest and Emissions as Compared to the Forest Reference Level. Forests, 11(8), 794. doi:10.3390/f11080794

                  Impact of modelling choices on setting the reference levels for the EU forest carbon sinks: how do different assumptions affect the country-specific forest reference levels? 

                  Published in 2019
                  Forsell, N., Korosuo, A., Gusti, M., Rüter, S., Havlik, P., & Obersteiner, M. (2019). Impact of modelling choices on setting the reference levels for the EU forest carbon sinks: how do different assumptions affect the country-specific forest reference levels? Carbon Balance and Management, 14(1). doi:10.1186/s13021-019-0125-9

                  Forest Resource Projection Tools at the European Level 

                  Published in 2017
                  Schelhaas MJ. et al. (2017) Forest Resource Projection Tools at the European Level. In: Barreiro S., Schelhaas MJ., McRoberts R., Kändler G. (eds) Forest Inventory-based Projection Systems for Wood and Biomass Availability. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56201-8_4

                  What causes differences between national estimates of forest management carbon emissions and removals compared to estimates of large-scale models? 

                  Published in 2013
                  Groen, T. A., Verkerk, P. J., Böttcher, H., Grassi, G., Cienciala, E., Black, K. G., … Blujdea, V. (2013). What causes differences between national estimates of forest management carbon emissions and removals compared to estimates of large-scale models? Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 222–232. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.06.005

                  Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios 

                  Published in 2013
                  Kindermann, G. E., Schörghuber, S., Linkosalo, T., Sanchez, A., Rammer, W., Seidl, R., & Lexer, M. J. (2013). Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios. Carbon Balance and Management, 8(1). doi:10.1186/1750-0680-8-2

                  Projection of the future EU forest CO2sink as affected by recent bioenergy policies using two advanced forest management models 

                  Published in 2012
                  Böttcher, H., Verkerk, P. J., Gusti, M., HavlÍk, P., & Grassi, G. (2012). Projection of the future EU forest CO2sink as affected by recent bioenergy policies using two advanced forest management models. GCB Bioenergy, 4(6), 773–783. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01152.x

                  Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation 

                  Published in 2008
                  Kindermann, G., Obersteiner, M., Sohngen, B., Sathaye, J., Andrasko, K., Rametsteiner, E., … Beach, R. (2008). Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(30), 10302–10307. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710616105

                  Other related documents

                  Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways 

                  Published in 2017
                  Popp, A., Calvin, K., Fujimori, S., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., Stehfest, E., … Vuuren, D. P. van. (2017). Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environmental Change, 42, 331–345. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002

                  The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century 

                  Published in 2017
                  Fricko, O., Havlik, P., Rogelj, J., Klimont, Z., Gusti, M., Johnson, N., … Riahi, K. (2017). The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century. Global Environmental Change, 42, 251–267. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004

                  Gusti, M., Khabarov, N. , & Forsell, N. (2015). Sensitivity of marginal abatement cost curves to variation of G4M parameters. In: Proceedings, 4th International Workshop on Uncertainty in Atmospheric Emissions, 7-9 October 2015, Krakow, Poland

                  Published in 2015

                  AN APPROACH TO MODELING LANDUSE CHANGE AND FOREST MANAGEMENT ON A GLOBAL SCALE 

                  Published in 2011
                  AN APPROACH TO MODELING LANDUSE CHANGE AND FOREST MANAGEMENT ON A GLOBAL SCALE. (2011). Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications. doi:10.5220/0003607501800185

                  Gusti, M. (2010). An algorithm for simulation of forest management decisions in the global forest model. Shtuchniy Intelekt 4 45-49.

                  Published in 2010

                  Gusti, M., Havlik, P. , & Obersteiner, M. (2008). Technical Description of the IIASA Model Cluster. Background Paper, Eliasch Review "Climate Change: Financing Global Forests," Office of Climate Change, UK (August 2008)

                  Published in 2008

                  Predicting the deforestation-trend under different carbon-prices 

                  Published in 2006
                  Kindermann, G. E., Obersteiner, M., Rametsteiner, E., & McCallum, I. (2006). Predicting the deforestation-trend under different carbon-prices. Carbon Balance and Management, 1(1). doi:10.1186/1750-0680-1-15