EPIC

Environmental impact calculator
Fact Sheet

Source: Commission modelling inventory and knowledge management system (MIDAS)

Date of Report Generation: Mon Apr 22 2024

Dissemination: Public

© European Union, 2024

The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated. You may be required to clear additional rights if a specific content depicts identifiable private individuals or includes third-party works. To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the rightholders. Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the Commission's reuse policy and are not licensed to you.

Disclaimer: The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any and all information made available on or accessible through MIDAS website. The information, including but not limited to models, impact assessments, models’ input and output data, and metadata, modelling exercises and policy contributions, is of a general nature only and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, and may not be regarded as comprehensive, complete, accurate or upto-date. The Commission furthermore does not assume any responsibility for content of any external websites to which links maybe provided on this website. Any and all information provided may not be regarded as professional or legal advice. Information available through the website may not be referenced as officially adopted text of European Union regulatory or policy documents or sources. Their authentic versions can only be accessed through the Official Journal of the European Union (the printed edition or, since 1 July 2013, the electronic edition on the EUR-Lex website).

Overview

Acronym

EPIC

Full title

Environmental impact calculator

Main purpose

EPIC simulates approximately eighty crops, predicting effects of management decisions on soil, water, nutrient and pesticide movements, and their combined impact on soil loss, water quality, and crop yields for areas with homogeneous soils and management. 

Summary

The EPIC model was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture to assess the status of U.S. soil and water resources and has been continuously expanded and refined to better analyze the exchange of GHG fluxes between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. It is used around the world by research groupsinstitutions, like IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis), who calibrate EPIC to meet their own needs.

It is a biophysical, continuous, field scale agriculture management model. It integrates a large number of biophysical processes and allows assimilation of Earth Observation products allowing for global calibration of environmental impact assessments. It simulates crop water requirements and the fate of nutrients and pesticides as affected by farming activities such as the timing of agrochemicals application, tillage, crop rotation, irrigation strategies, etc., while providing at the same time a basic farm economic account. The main components can be divided in the following items: hydrology, weather, erosion, nutrients, soil temperature, and plant growth. EPIC maintains a daily water balance taking into account runoff, drainage, irrigation and evapotranspiration. EPIC simulates nitrogen phosphorus cycling and losses. Nitrogen and phosphorus can be lost in dissolved and particulate forms. Losses occur through surface runoff, leaching to the aquifer, gaseous losses and sediment transport.

EPIC is used to assess the economic and environmental effects on agricultural and forest lands of enhancing carbon sinks and GHG abatement measures.

 

Model categories

Environment

Model keywords

agriculturenitrogen cyclephosphorus cyclepesticidesirrigationfarming practices

Model homepage

http://epicapex.tamu.edu/epic/

Ownership and Licence

Ownership

Third-party ownership (commercial companies, Member States, other organisations, …)

Ownership details

Texas A&M AgriLife Research

Licence type

Free Software licence

The license grants freedom to run the programme for any purpose; freedom to run the program for any purpose; freedom to study (by accessing the source code) how the program works, and change it so it does enable computing; freedom to redistribute copies; and freedom to distribute copies of modified versions to others.

Details

Structure and approach

The EPIC model was developed to evaluate the effect of various land management strategies on 
agricultural sustainability including erosion, water supply and quality, soil quality, plant competition,
weather, pests, and economics. Management capabilities include irrigation, drainage, furrow diking, buffer strips, terraces, waterways, fertilization, manure management, lagoons, reservoirs, crop rotation and selection, pesticide application, grazing, and tillage. Besides these farm management functions, EPIC can be used to evaluate the effects of global climate change. EPIC is an application written in Fortan with the possibility to use a user friendly graphical interface (WinEPIC).

Input and parametrization

Model inputs:

  • daily meteorological data
  • soil profile information: texture, organic matter content
  • landuse data with crop distribution
  • farm management data: planting, harvesting, tillage, fertilization, pesticide application, irrigation

More specifically:

  • regional and global weather/climate change data (statistics)
  • regional and global soil data
  • regional and global land use data and representative crop rotations
  • regional and global topography data
  • regional and global crop management data (e.g. fertilization, irrigation, tillage)

Main output

Model output:

  • biomass production
  • nutrient losses:
    • nitrate losses ins surface runoff and leaching to aquifers
    • organic N losses in sediments
    • gaseous losses of N
    • phosphorus leaching to aquifer and losses with sediments and surface runoff
  • nutrient pool

More specifically:

  • crop yields
  • hydrology (PET, runoff, percolation)
  • sediment transport
  • N-leaching
  • greenhouse gases
  • soil carbon sequestrations

Spatial & Temporal extent

The output has the following spatial-temporal resolution and extent:

ParameterDescription
Spatial extent / country coverageEU Member states 27Ecowas countriesAfrica
EU27+Switzerland and Turkey
Spatial resolutionRegular Grid 10km - 50km
10X10 km grid
Temporal extentMedium-term (5 to 15 years)Long-term (more than 15 years)
1990-2010
Temporal resolutionMonthsYears
daily

Quality & Transparency

Quality

Model uncertainties

Models are by definition affected by uncertainties (in input data, input parameters, scenario definitions, etc.). Have the model uncertainties been quantified? Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?

yes
Large body of literature is available including about model use & calibration.

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis helps identifying the uncertain inputs mostly responsible for the uncertainty in the model responses. Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?

yes
Large body of literature is available including about model use & calibration.

Have model results been published in peer-reviewed articles?

yes
Large body of literature is available about the model including peer reviewed articles.

Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?

Please note that this does not refer to the cases when model results were validated by stakeholders.

no

    Model validation

    Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?

    yes
    Large body of literature is available including about model validation.

    Transparency

    To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?

    This may include sources accessible upon subscription and/or payment

    Based on both publicly available and restricted-access sources

    Is the full model database as such available to external users?

    Whether or not it implies a specific procedure or a fee

    no
    An internal database has been built by the Water and Marine Resources Unit. It has been aligned when possible with the data used by the LISFLOOD model.

      Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?

      Note this excludes IA reports.

      yes

      Have output datasets been made publicly available?

      Note this could also imply a specific procedure or a fee.

      no
      The model results, in particular those linked to estimation of irrigation have been made available.

        Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?

        For instance: Dashboard, interactive interfaces...

        no

          Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?

          Note this excludes IA reports.

          yes
          User manual available from the website.

          Is there a dedicated public website where information about the model is provided?

          yes

          Is the model code open-source?

          no

          Can the code be accessed upon request?

          yes

          The model’s policy relevance and intended role in the policy cycle

          The model is designed to contribute to the following policy areas

          • Climate action
          • Environment

          The model is designed to contribute to the following phases of the policy cycle

          • Formulation – such as ex-ante Impact Assessments

          The model’s potential

          Not provided.

          Previous use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments of the European Commission

          Use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments since July 2017.

          2018
          SWD/2018/249 final/2

          Impact assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council: on minimum requirements for water reuse

          Lead by
          ENV
          Run by
          European Commission
          Contribution role
          baseline and assessment of policy options
          Contribution details

          The model helped to assess the following impacts:

          • Emission of greenhouse gases
          • Ability to adapt to climate change
          • Availability or quality of Fresh- or ground water
          • Drinking water
          • Acidification, contamination or salinity of soil, and soil erosion rates
          • Use of non-renewable resources

          Bibliographic references

          Studies that uses the model or its results

          No references in this category

          Peer review for model validation

          The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history 

          Published in 1990
          The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history. (1990). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 329(1255), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0184

          The EPIC Crop Growth Model 

          Published in 1989
          J. R. Williams, C. A. Jones, J. R. Kiniry, & D. A. Spanel. (1989). The EPIC Crop Growth Model. Transactions of the ASAE, 32(2), 0497–0511. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31032

          A Modeling Approach to Determining the Relationship Between Erosion and Soil Productivity 

          Published in 1984
          J. R. Williams, C. A. Jones, & P. T. Dyke. (1984). A Modeling Approach to Determining the Relationship Between Erosion and Soil Productivity. Transactions of the ASAE, 27(1), 0129–0144. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.32748

          Model documentation

          No references in this category

          Other related documents

          No references in this category