DOMESTIC FOOTPRINT

Environmental impacts of the domestic production and consumption of EU and EU countries
Fact Sheet

Source: Commission modelling inventory and knowledge management system (MIDAS)

Date of Report Generation: Mon Apr 22 2024

Dissemination: Public

© European Union, 2024

The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated. You may be required to clear additional rights if a specific content depicts identifiable private individuals or includes third-party works. To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the rightholders. Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the Commission's reuse policy and are not licensed to you.

Disclaimer: The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any and all information made available on or accessible through MIDAS website. The information, including but not limited to models, impact assessments, models’ input and output data, and metadata, modelling exercises and policy contributions, is of a general nature only and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, and may not be regarded as comprehensive, complete, accurate or upto-date. The Commission furthermore does not assume any responsibility for content of any external websites to which links maybe provided on this website. Any and all information provided may not be regarded as professional or legal advice. Information available through the website may not be referenced as officially adopted text of European Union regulatory or policy documents or sources. Their authentic versions can only be accessed through the Official Journal of the European Union (the printed edition or, since 1 July 2013, the electronic edition on the EUR-Lex website).

Overview

Acronym

DOMESTIC FOOTPRINT

Full title

Environmental impacts of the domestic production and consumption of EU and EU countries

Main purpose

The Domestic Footprint is a set of 16 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-based indicators (also available as a single score), aimed at quantifying the environmental impacts caused by domestic production and consumption, hence limiting the scope to emissions released and resources extracted within the EU territory, which are translated into impacts by using the Environmental Footprint method (Sanye Mengual & Sala, 2023).

Summary

Towards assessing the environmental impacts of domestic production and consumption activities, the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (EC-JRC) developed the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-based Domestic Footprint indicator (Sanye Mengual et al., 2022). The goal of this indicator is to monitor the environmental impacts of EU and Member States domestic activities along time and the efforts of EU Member States to their domestic environmental impacts from economic growth. The Domestic Footprint assesses the environmental impacts of the domestic activities (production and consumption) at EU and at Member States level, including embodied impacts due to trade (consumption perspective) including the 16 impacts of the Environmental Footprint method (EC, 2021) (e.g. climate change, ecotoxicity, land use related impacts, water use related impacts, etc.). Furthermore, the environmental impacts of domestic activities can be assessed against the Planetary Boundaries (PBs) towards identifying the current situation in relation to the ecological limits of our planet.

The model may serve policy-makers for three main aspects that can support the analysis of both existing and future policies:

  • Monitoring of policies along time, including analyses from different perspectives (e.g., decoupling)
  • Identification of hotspots at different levels (e.g., impact category, environmental emission)
  • Analysis of policy and green transition scenarios

Model categories

AgricultureClimateEnvironmentTerritoryEnergy

Model keywords

sustainabilityLCALife Cycle AssessmentEnvironmental Impactsustainable production

Model homepage

Ownership and Licence

Ownership

EU ownership (European Commision)

Ownership details

The model has been developed in the context of the European Commission’s European Platform of Life Cycle Assessment.

Licence type

No information available

Details

Structure and approach

The Domestic Footprint is a set of 16 LCA-based indicators, aimed at quantifying the environmental impacts of domestic production and consumption activities within the EU territory (Sanye Mengual & Sala, 2023). The Domestic Footprint aims at assessing the environmental impacts associated to emissions and resource extraction occurring within a Member State boundary (or the whole EU boundary) by adopting a production- and territorial-based perspective. Therefore, it accounts for both production and consumption activities taking place within the Member State’s domestic territory, e.g., from economic sectors such as industry, agriculture, energy, mining, and services; and also encompasses those impacts from households and government’s activities (e.g., transport, heating). The geographical scope of the Domestic Footprint is both the EU and Member States level.

The Domestic Footprint implements the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, which entails four main steps:

  1. Definition of goal and scope. This step includes the overall design of the study, e.g. the definition of the specific objectives of the study, the description of the modelling assumptions, the identification of the intended audience etc.
  2. Definition of the life cycle inventory (LCI). In this step, data on inputs, i.e. resources, and outputs, i.e. emissions in the environmental compartments (air, water, soil), entering and leaving the system under study should be collected.
  3. Assessment of the environmental impacts. In this step, the environmental impacts due to resources use and emissions reported in the inventory are calculated through the use of impact models. Sixteen indicators referred to different impacts are considered, such as climate change, eutrophication of water bodies, use of fossil, mineral and metal resources. Furthermore, endpoint assessment models can be applied to assess effects of these 16 impacts on 3 areas of protection, i.e. human health, ecosystem health, and natural resources. These 16 indicators may be normalised by global impacts and weighted to be summarised in one “single score” indicator. Compared to the 16 indicators, the single score indicator has the advantage of being more effective for communication and for supporting the selection of alternatives, but at the same time “hides” part of the complexity of the different environmental impacts, and introduce a subjective element, i.e. weighting, which may affect the results.
  4. Interpretation of the results. This step is aimed at fulfilling the goal and scope of the study. Typical questions which may be answered at this stage are “which are the most impacting stages of the supply chain?”, “which are the effects on the environment of a certain policy?”. LCA results are characterised by different sources of uncertainty which should be considered in the interpretation of the results. The definition of the life cycle inventory is subject to the availability of average information describing the system. In addition, impact assessment models are characterised by uncertainties, which to different extent influence the robustness of the 16 indicators

The Domestic Footprint is a comprehensive collection of data on resource use (e.g., minerals and metals, energy carriers, land use, water use) and emissions to air (e.g., greenhouse gases, particulate matter), water (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorous) and soil (e.g., heavy metals, pesticides) taking place in the territory complemented by emission estimates based on modelling. This collection results in a Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) and includes an exhaustive list of environmental pressures resulting from domestic activities. Environmental pressures are then translated into environmental impacts through the implementation of the Environmental Footprint 3.1 (EF reference package 3.1) method in the Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) stage. The EF 3.1 method includes 16 impact categories, which can be normalized and weighted for their aggregation into a single weighted score. Normalization Factors (NFs) correspond to the EF global NFs, while Weighting Factors (WFs) of the EF weighting set are employed in this study. Finally, the assessment against PBs as absolute ecological thresholds is performed by employing the LCIA-based PBs developed for the EF framework.

Input and parametrization

The Domestic Footprint is based on the combination of:

  1. the emissions to air, soil and water as well as the resources used in the territory;
  2. the Environmental Footprint (EF) impact assessment method, which translates emissions and resource consumption into potential environmental impacts.

The Domestic Footprint results from aggregating the environmental impacts of resource use and emissions to the environment in the territory. Resource use and emissions (life cycle inventory) are based either on statistics or on modelling.

Main output

The Domestic Footprint results can be reported at different scales:

  • At EU level
  • At Member States level
  • Per environmental pressure (resource use, environmental emission)
  • Per environmental impact category (Climate change, Ozone depletion, Particulate matter, Ionising radiation, Photochemical ozone formation, Acidification, Terrestrial Eutrophication, Freshwater Eutrophication, Marine Eutrophication, Freshwater ecotoxicity, Human toxicity (non-cancer), Human toxicity (cancer), Land use, Water use, Resource use (fossils), Resource use (minerals and metals)
  • As a single headline indicator (domestic footprint)

Spatial & Temporal extent

The output has the following spatial-temporal resolution and extent:

ParameterDescription
Spatial extent / country coverageEU Member states 27
Spatial resolutionWorld-regions (supranational)National
Temporal extentLong-term (more than 15 years)
Temporal resolutionYearsMultiple years

Quality & Transparency

Quality

Model uncertainties

Models are by definition affected by uncertainties (in input data, input parameters, scenario definitions, etc.). Have the model uncertainties been quantified? Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?

no
The Domestic Footprint has many layers of input parameters that could lead to uncertainty of the overall result: - Input data on resource use and emissions to the environment - Modelling of resource use and emissions to the environment - Impact assessment models of the Environmental Footprint method. So far, uncertainties have not been quantified. However, ranges could be tested. Regarding the Environmental Footprint impact assessment method (EF 3.1) recommendations (Andreasi Bassi et al., 2023), model robustness for each of the 16 indicator has been evaluated (EC, 2021).

    Sensitivity analysis

    Sensitivity analysis helps identifying the uncertain inputs mostly responsible for the uncertainty in the model responses. Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?

    yes
    The Domestic Footprint can deal with sensitivity analysis for many parameters, including resource extraction and emissions intensity data and environmental impact data. No formal sensitivity analysis has been performed to check all parameters as this would be very time demanding.

      Have model results been published in peer-reviewed articles?

      yes

        Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?

        Please note that this does not refer to the cases when model results were validated by stakeholders.

        no

          Model validation

          Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?

          yes
          Validation has been performed with other models, but observed data are not available.

            Transparency

            To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?

            This may include sources accessible upon subscription and/or payment

            Based on both publicly available and restricted-access sources

            Is the full model database as such available to external users?

            Whether or not it implies a specific procedure or a fee

            no

              Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?

              Note this excludes IA reports.

              yes

              Have output datasets been made publicly available?

              Note this could also imply a specific procedure or a fee.

              Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?

              For instance: Dashboard, interactive interfaces...

              Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?

              Note this excludes IA reports.

              yes

              Is there a dedicated public website where information about the model is provided?

              Is the model code open-source?

              no

              Can the code be accessed upon request?

              no

              The model’s policy relevance and intended role in the policy cycle

              The model is designed to contribute to the following policy areas

              • Agriculture and rural development
              • Business and industry
              • Climate action
              • Consumers
              • Energy
              • Environment
              • Maritime affairs and fisheries
              • Public health
              • Trade
              • Transport

              The model is designed to contribute to the following phases of the policy cycle

              • Anticipation – such as foresight and horizon scanning
              • Evaluation – such as ex-post evaluation
              • Formulation – such as ex-ante Impact Assessments
              • Implementation – this also includes monitoring
              • Other

              The model’s potential

              The Domestic Footprint has been designed aiming at supporting policy-making in:

              • Monitoring: yearly updates of the indicator allow tracking the evolution of impacts associated with changes in production and consumption patterns within Member States boundaries. This may be strategic for monitoring e.g.,:
                • how much the EU is decoupling environmental impacts from economic growth,
                • the benefits of transition towards circular economy,
                • the ability of the EU to remain within planetary boundaries
                • as well as progress related to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (especially SDG12 on responsible consumption and production) (UN, 2015).
              • Identification of environmental hotspots: identification of most contributing pressures (emissions or resources) to the environmental impacts e.g. towards reaching environmental targets. This can be performed at multiple levels:
                • elementary flows (resource use, emissions to the environment) to a specific environmental impact,
                • identifying the environmental impacts beyond the planetary boundaries requiring more urgent action.
              • Setting a baseline for monitoring and against which testing policy options and scenarios: the Domestic Footprint sets a baseline for monitoring purposes of domestic impacts or for assessing scenarios based on, e.g., modelling exercises, such as expected effect of circular economy on resources use and climate change emissions.

              Previous use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments of the European Commission

              Use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments since July 2017.

              2022
              SWD/2022/82 final

              Impact Assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC

              Lead by
              ENV
              Run by
              European Commission
              Contribution role
              problem definition
              Contribution details

              The model has been used to analyse the current environmental impacts of the baseline and assess them against the Planetary Boundaries.

              Bibliographic references

              Studies that uses the model or its results

              No references in this category

              Peer review for model validation

              Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries 

              Published in 2020
              Sala, S., Crenna, E., Secchi, M., & Sanyé-Mengual, E. (2020). Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries. Journal of Environmental Management, 269, 110686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110686

              A distance-to-target weighting method for Europe 2020 

              Published in 2016
              Castellani, V., Benini, L., Sala, S., & Pant, R. (2016). A distance-to-target weighting method for Europe 2020. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(8), 1159–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1079-8

              Model documentation

              No references in this category

              Other related documents

              No references in this category