AIM
Source: Commission modelling inventory and knowledge management system (MIDAS)
Date of Report Generation: Thu Mar 06 2025
Dissemination: Public
© European Union, 2025
The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. This means that reuse is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and changes are indicated. You may be required to clear additional rights if a specific content depicts identifiable private individuals or includes third-party works. To use or reproduce content that is not owned by the EU, you may need to seek permission directly from the rightholders. Software or documents covered by industrial property rights, such as patents, trade marks, registered designs, logos and names, are excluded from the Commission's reuse policy and are not licensed to you.
Disclaimer: The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any and all information made available on or accessible through MIDAS website. The information, including but not limited to models, impact assessments, models’ input and output data, and metadata, modelling exercises and policy contributions, is of a general nature only and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, and may not be regarded as comprehensive, complete, accurate or upto-date. The Commission furthermore does not assume any responsibility for content of any external websites to which links maybe provided on this website. Any and all information provided may not be regarded as professional or legal advice. Information available through the website may not be referenced as officially adopted text of European Union regulatory or policy documents or sources. Their authentic versions can only be accessed through the Official Journal of the European Union (the printed edition or, since 1 July 2013, the electronic edition on the EUR-Lex website).
Overview
Acronym
AIM
Full title
Aviation Integrated Model
Main purpose
The Aviation Integrated Model (AIM) is a global aviation systems model which simulates interactions between passengers, airlines, airports and other system actors into the future, with the goal of providing insight into how policy levers and other projected system changes will affect aviation’s externalities and economic impacts.
Summary
The Aviation Integrated Model (AIM) is a systems model of global aviation. It simulates the behaviour of passengers, airlines, airports and other system actors going forward to 2050 and beyond, with the goal of providing insight into how policy levers and other projected system changes will affect aviation’s externalities and economic impacts. The model was originally developed in 2006-2009 with UK research council funding (e.g. Reynolds et al., 2007; Dray et al. 2014), and was updated as part of the ACCLAIM project (2015-2018) between University College London, Imperial College and Southampton University (e.g. Dray et al., 2019; Schäfer et al., 2018), with additional input from MIT. The model is open-source, with code, documentation and a simplified version of model databases which omit confidential data available from the UCL Air Transportation Systems Group website [1].
AIM uses a modular, integrated approach to simulate the global aviation system and its response to policy. AIM consists of seven interconnected modules. The Demand and Fare Module projects true origin-ultimate destination demand between a set of cities representing approximately 95% of global scheduled RPK, using a gravity-type demand model (Dray et al. 2014). Within each city-city passenger flow, itinerary, airport and routing choice (including hub airport for multi-segment journeys) are handled using a multinomial logit model (Dray & Doyme 2019), and itinerary fares are simulated using a fare model (see Dray et al,. 2019 and references therein) based on segment airline costs and other factors. These models are complemented by simpler models for freight flow and non-scheduled passengers. The Airport Activity Module simulates the flight schedule that would be required to transport passengers and freight, the aircraft that would be used per flight segment, and airport-level operations and delays, and the Aircraft Movement Module simulates en-route fuel use and inefficiency factors. The Aircraft Technology and Cost Module calculates fleet composition, airline costs, and airline choices on technology adoption, and feeds airline costs back into the fare model. Once the model has converged, climate impacts, local air quality and noise, and regional economic impacts are calculated by the three output modules. These models are estimated primarily on detailed disaggregate global passenger routing, fare and schedule data.
AIM has been used for multiple studies on the impact of aircraft technology and policy interventions, both in the academic literature and for policymakers. This includes studies for DG CLIMA on the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for aviation, the UK Department for Transport on carbon leakage, and the International Energy Agency on long-term aviation emissions projections.
[1] http://www.atslab.org; note that the website-available version is not always the most recent version of the model.
Model categories
Transport
Model keywords
aviation
Model homepage
Ownership and Licence
Ownership
Third-party ownership (commercial companies, Member States, other organisations, …)
Ownership details
Licence type
Free Software licence
The license grants freedom to run the programme for any purpose; freedom to run the program for any purpose; freedom to study (by accessing the source code) how the program works, and change it so it does enable computing; freedom to redistribute copies; and freedom to distribute copies of modified versions to others.
Details
Structure and approach
AIM uses a modular, integrated approach to simulate the global aviation system and its response to new policies and technologies. AIM consists of seven interconnected modules. The Demand and Fare Module projects true origin-ultimate destination demand between a set of cities representing approximately 95% of global scheduled RPK, using a gravity-type demand model (Dray et al. 2014) where demand is a function of origin and destination population and income, and city-pair trip characteristics such as fare and journey time. Within each city-city passenger flow, itinerary, airport and routing choice (including hub airport for multi-segment journeys) are handled using a multinomial logit model (Dray & Doyme 2019) which assesses choices as a function of itinerary fare, time, frequency and other factors, and itinerary fares are simulated using a fare model (see Dray et al,. 2019 and references therein) based on segment airline costs and other factors. These models are complemented by simpler models for freight flows and non-scheduled passengers.
The Airline and Airport Activity Module, given segment-level demand, assesses which aircraft will be used to fly these routes and at what frequency, using a multinomial logit model estimated from historical scheduling data (Sabre, 2017) and dividing the fleet into nine size categories. Given these aircraft movements per airport, a queuing model then estimates what the resulting airport-level delays would be (see Dray et al,. 2019 and references therein). Given the lack of long-term airport capacity forecasts, in most cases this delay model is used to estimate the amount of (city-level) capacity that would be required to keep delays at current levels.
The aircraft movement module assesses the corresponding airborne routes and the consequent location of emissions. In particular, routing inefficiencies which increase ground track distance flown beyond great circle distance, and fuel use above optimal for the given flight distance, are modelled using distance-based regional inefficiency factors based on an analysis of radar track data.
Given typical aircraft utilization, the aircraft technology and cost module assesses the size, composition, age and technology use of the aircraft fleet, and the resulting costs for airlines and emissions implications. First, aircraft movements by size class including routing inefficiency from the Aircraft Movement Module are input to a performance model (estimated from outputs of the PIANO-X (Lissys, 2017) model with reference aircraft types and missions for CO2 and NOx, the FOX methodology (Stettler et al. 2013) for PM2.5, and Wood et al. (2008) for NO2). Second, the costs of operating this fleet for the given schedule are estimated based on historical cost data by category and aircraft type (see Dray et al,. 2019 and references therein). Third, emissions and costs are adjusted to account for the current age distribution and technology utilization of the fleet, including typical retirement and freighter conversion behavior (e.g. Dray, 2013). Finally, any shortfall in aircraft required to perform the given schedule is assumed made up by new purchases, and the uptake of technology and emissions mitigation measures by both new aircraft and existing ones is assessed on a net present value basis, as described in Dray et al. (2018), and the impact of this on costs and emissions is assessed.
These four modules are run iteratively until a stable solution is reached. Data is then output which can be used in the global climate, air quality and noise, and regional economics modules. The global climate module is a rapid, reduced-form climate model which calculates the resulting climate metrics (e.g. CO2e in terms of global temperature potential (GTP) and global warming potential (GWP) at different time horizons; see Krammer et al., 2013). The air quality and noise module are similarly rapid, reduced-form models which provide metrics by airport for the noise and local/regional air quality impacts of the projected aviation system. In the case of air quality, dispersion modelling for primary pollutants uses a version of the RDC code (e.g. Yim et al., 2015). The type of noise modelling carried out depends on whether data on standard flight routes per airport is available, but for all airports noise modelling based on total noise energy is carried out (Torija et al. 2017). The regional economics module looks in more detail at the economic impacts, including benefits such as increased employment as well as costing of noise and air quality impacts.
The output data from the first four AIM modules can also be used more generally as input to external impacts models: for example, the model includes the option to produce detailed emissions inventories which can be input into climate models. Further information on the individual sub-models, on model validation, and on typical model inputs and outputs can be found in the papers cited above and in the model documentation (Dray, 2020. AIM2015: Documentation. http://www.atslab.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/AIM-2015-Documentation-v9-270120.pdf).
Input and parametrization
- Population, GDP and urbanisation projections at regional or country level, by year, across the model time horizon
- Energy price projections (oil, electricity, gas), by year and country/region where relevant, across the model time horizon
- Carbon price projections by year and applicable scheme (e.g. EU ETS, CORSIA) across the model time horizon
- Carbon intensity of electricity generation by year and country/region across the model time horizon
- Technology characteristics (e.g. entry into service date of next aircraft generation, biofuel feedstock costs, etc; dependent on what is being evaluated, default assumptions are included in the model)
- Other policy characteristics as required (dependent on what is being evaluated; e.g. contrail or NOx pricing)
Main output
- Passenger and freight aviation demand projections (passengers, flights, RPK, FTK) – at global, regional, country or flight segment level_
- Airport passenger flows, local emissions (NOx, PM) and revenues
- Average fares and airline operating costs, global/regional or individual itinerary/flight segment level
- Aviation CO2 and other emissions (NOx, PM, H2O, fuel lifecycle CH4, N2O) – on a direct, fuel lifecycle or net basis, global/regional/country/flight segment/aircraft type level
- Uptake of new technologies, on a regional basis, number of aircraft
Spatial & Temporal extent
The output has the following spatial-temporal resolution and extent:
Parameter | Description |
---|---|
Spatial extent / country coverage | ALL countries of the WORLD |
Global model, includes all countries with significant aviation activity. | |
Spatial resolution | World-regions (supranational)NationalEntityRegular Grid 1km - 10km |
airport, flight segment/itinerary level | |
Temporal extent | Long-term (more than 15 years)Other |
Base year is 2015. The latest year the model can be run to is 2100 (with considerable uncertainty). | |
Temporal resolution | Years |
Quality & Transparency
Quality
Model uncertainties
Models are by definition affected by uncertainties (in input data, input parameters, scenario definitions, etc.). Have the model uncertainties been quantified? Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?
- response
- yes
- details
- Uncertainties are accounted for via scenario or Monte Carlo analysis for socioeconomic/policy variables and lens/monte carlo modelling for uncertain technology/fuel parameters.
- url
Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis helps identifying the uncertain inputs mostly responsible for the uncertainty in the model responses. Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?
- response
- yes
- details
- Sensitivity analysis was carried out as part of the initial AIM2015 validation process (Dray et al. 2019). Further sensitivity analysis, concentrating on fuel and carbon costs and socioeconomic scenario, was carried out as part of the process of making an AIM metamodel for the HORIZON2020 NAVIGATE project.
- url
Have model results been published in peer-reviewed articles?
- response
- yes
- details
- url
Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?
Please note that this does not refer to the cases when model results were validated by stakeholders.
- response
- no
- details
- The ACCLAIM project, during which the model was comprehensively updated, involved periodic review by a project advisory board
- url
Model validation
Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?
- response
- yes
- details
- Validation is via peer review in the scientific literature and through comparing backcasting outcomes with actual developments (in particular see Dray et al., 2019). During this process, the model is run with a 2005 base year and outcomes between 2005 and the present day are assessed against observed outcomes.
- url
Transparency
To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?
This may include sources accessible upon subscription and/or payment
- response
- Based on both publicly available and restricted-access sources
Is the full model database as such available to external users?
Whether or not it implies a specific procedure or a fee
- response
- yes
- details
- Note that some model data is confidential and so a simplified version is provided in the public database
- url
Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?
Note this excludes IA reports.
- response
- yes
- details
- documents
For details please refer to the 'peer review for model validation' documents in the bibliographic references
Have output datasets been made publicly available?
Note this could also imply a specific procedure or a fee.
- response
- no
- details
- There is no limitation on making model outputs public
- url
Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?
For instance: Dashboard, interactive interfaces...
- response
- no
- details
- url
Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?
Note this excludes IA reports.
- response
- yes
- details
Is there a dedicated public website where information about the model is provided?
- response
- yes
Is the model code open-source?
- response
- yes
Can the code be accessed upon request?
- response
- not applicable
- details
The model’s policy relevance and intended role in the policy cycle
The model is designed to contribute to the following policy areas
- Climate action
- Energy
- Environment
- Transport
The model is designed to contribute to the following phases of the policy cycle
- Anticipation – such as foresight and horizon scanning
- Formulation – such as ex-ante Impact Assessments
The model’s potential
AIM is intended to be used to assess policy or technology levels applied to all or part of the global aviation system. This could include changes in costs to airlines or passengers, or changes in the cost or availability of alternative technology. It has been used to assess carbon trading and offsetting policy (e.g., as part of the assessment for DG CLIMA on how the EU ETS and CORSIA should interact). In the academic literature it has been used to assess the environmental and economic impacts of a range of interventions, including the availability of battery electric aircraft (Schafer et al. 2018) and early aircraft retirement (Dray et al. 2014).
Previous use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments of the European Commission
Use of the model in ex-ante impact assessments since July 2017.
2021SWD/2021/603 final
Impact assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council: amending Directive 2003/87/EC as regards aviation's contribution to the Union’s economy-wide emission reduction target and appropriately implementing a global market-based measure
- Lead by
- CLIMA
- Run by
- University College London, Air Transportation Analytics
- Contribution role
- baseline and assessment of policy options
- Contribution details
The AIM model was used to assess the impacts of options on the aviation sector, including direct and net aviation CO2 emissions, the percentage of global aviation CO2 emissions covered, carbon costs as a proportion of airline fuel and operating costs, impacts on demand for passenger and freight transport, demand for EU allowances and CORSIA offsets, auctioning revenues, ticket prices, and other externalities including from congestion and local air pollutants.