Annex 4 analytical methods

model description

general description

acronym
AIM
name
Aviation Integrated Model
main purpose
The Aviation Integrated Model (AIM) is a global aviation systems model which simulates interactions between passengers, airlines, airports and other system actors into the future, with the goal of providing insight into how policy levers and other projected system changes will affect aviation’s externalities and economic impacts.
homepage
https://www.atslab.org/

Developer and its nature

ownership
Third-party ownership (commercial companies, Member States, other organisations, …)
ownership additional info
The model is owned by University College London (UCL)
is the model code open-source?
YES

Model structure and approach with any key assumptions, limitations and simplifications

details on model structure and approach

AIM uses a modular, integrated approach to simulate the global aviation system and its response to new policies and technologies. AIM consists of seven interconnected modules. The Demand and Fare Module projects true origin-ultimate destination demand between a set of cities representing approximately 95% of global scheduled RPK, using a gravity-type demand model (Dray et al. 2014) where demand is a function of origin and destination population and income, and city-pair trip characteristics such as fare and journey time. Within each city-city passenger flow, itinerary, airport and routing choice (including hub airport for multi-segment journeys) are handled using a multinomial logit model (Dray & Doyme 2019) which assesses choices as a function of itinerary fare, time, frequency and other factors, and itinerary  fares are simulated using a fare model (see Dray et al,. 2019 and references therein) based on segment airline costs and other factors. These models are complemented by simpler models for freight flows and non-scheduled passengers.

The Airline and Airport Activity Module, given segment-level demand, assesses which aircraft will be used to fly these routes and at what frequency, using a multinomial logit model estimated from historical scheduling data (Sabre, 2017) and dividing the fleet into nine size categories. Given these aircraft movements per airport, a queuing model then estimates what the resulting airport-level delays would be (see Dray et al,. 2019 and references therein). Given the lack of long-term airport capacity forecasts, in most cases this delay model is used to estimate the amount of (city-level) capacity that would be required to keep delays at current levels.

The aircraft movement module assesses the corresponding airborne routes and the consequent location of emissions. In particular, routing inefficiencies which increase ground track distance flown beyond great circle distance, and fuel use above optimal for the given flight distance, are modelled using distance-based regional inefficiency factors based on an analysis of radar track data.

Given typical aircraft utilization, the aircraft technology and cost module assesses the size, composition, age and technology use of the aircraft fleet, and the resulting costs for airlines and emissions implications. First, aircraft movements by size class including routing inefficiency from the Aircraft Movement Module are input to a performance model (estimated from outputs of the PIANO-X (Lissys, 2017) model with reference aircraft types and missions for CO2 and NOx, the FOX methodology (Stettler et al. 2013) for PM2.5, and Wood et al. (2008) for NO2). Second, the costs of operating this fleet for the given schedule are estimated based on historical cost data by category and aircraft type (see Dray et al,. 2019 and references therein). Third, emissions and costs are adjusted to account for the current age distribution and technology utilization of the fleet, including typical retirement and freighter conversion behavior (e.g. Dray, 2013). Finally, any shortfall in aircraft required to perform the given schedule is assumed made up by new purchases, and the uptake of technology and emissions mitigation measures by both new aircraft and existing ones is assessed on a net present value basis, as described in Dray et al. (2018), and the impact of this on costs and emissions is assessed.

These four modules are run iteratively until a stable solution is reached. Data is then output which can be used in the global climate, air quality and noise, and regional economics modules. The global climate module is a rapid, reduced-form climate model which calculates the resulting climate metrics (e.g. CO2e in terms of global temperature potential (GTP) and global warming potential (GWP) at different time horizons; see Krammer et al.,  2013). The air quality and noise module are similarly rapid, reduced-form models which provide metrics by airport for the noise and local/regional air quality impacts of the projected aviation system. In the case of air quality, dispersion modelling for primary pollutants uses a version of the RDC code (e.g. Yim et al., 2015). The type of noise modelling carried out depends on whether data on standard flight routes per airport is available, but for all airports noise modelling based on total noise energy is carried out (Torija et al. 2017). The regional economics module looks in more detail at the economic impacts, including benefits such as increased employment as well as costing of noise and air quality impacts.

The output data from the first four AIM modules can also be used more generally as input to external impacts models: for example, the model includes the option to produce detailed emissions inventories which can be input into climate models. Further information on the individual sub-models, on model validation, and on typical model inputs and outputs can be found in the papers cited above and in the model documentation (Dray, 2020. AIM2015: Documentation. http://www.atslab.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/AIM-2015-Documentation-v9-270120.pdf).

model inputs
  • Population, GDP and urbanisation projections at regional or country level, by year, across the model time horizon
  • Energy price projections (oil, electricity, gas), by year and country/region where relevant, across the model time horizon
  • Carbon price projections by year and applicable scheme (e.g. EU ETS, CORSIA) across the model time horizon
  • Carbon intensity of electricity generation by year and country/region across the model time horizon
  • Technology characteristics (e.g. entry into service date of next aircraft generation, biofuel feedstock costs, etc; dependent on what is being evaluated, default assumptions are included in the model)
  • Other policy characteristics as required (dependent on what is being evaluated; e.g. contrail or NOx pricing)
model outputs
  • Passenger and freight aviation demand projections (passengers, flights, RPK, FTK) – at global, regional, country or flight segment level_
  • Airport passenger flows, local emissions (NOx, PM) and revenues
  • Average fares and airline operating costs, global/regional or individual itinerary/flight segment level
  • Aviation CO2 and other emissions (NOx, PM, H2O, fuel lifecycle CH4, N2O) – on a direct, fuel lifecycle or net basis, global/regional/country/flight segment/aircraft type level
  • Uptake of new technologies, on a regional basis, number of aircraft

Intended field of application

policy role

AIM is intended to be used to assess policy or technology levels applied to all or part of the global aviation system. This could include changes in costs to airlines or passengers, or changes in the cost or availability of alternative technology. It has been used to assess carbon trading and offsetting policy (e.g., as part of the assessment for DG CLIMA on how the EU ETS and CORSIA should interact). In the academic literature it has been used to assess the environmental and economic impacts of a range of interventions, including the availability of battery electric aircraft (Schafer et al. 2018) and  early aircraft retirement (Dray et al. 2014).

policy areas
  • Climate action 
  • Energy 
  • Environment 
  • Transport 

Model transparency and quality assurance

Are uncertainties accounted for in your simulations?
YES - Uncertainties are accounted for via scenario or Monte Carlo analysis for socioeconomic/policy variables and lens/monte carlo modelling for uncertain technology/fuel parameters.
Has the model undergone sensitivity analysis?
YES - Sensitivity analysis was carried out as part of the initial AIM2015 validation process (Dray et al. 2019). Further sensitivity analysis, concentrating on fuel and carbon costs and socioeconomic scenario, was carried out as part of the process of making an AIM metamodel for the HORIZON2020 NAVIGATE project.
Has the model been published in peer review articles?
YES
Has the model formally undergone scientific review by a panel of international experts?
NO - The ACCLAIM project, during which the model was comprehensively updated, involved periodic review by a project advisory board
Has model validation been done? Have model predictions been confronted with observed data (ex-post)?
YES - Validation is via peer review in the scientific literature and through comparing backcasting outcomes with actual developments (in particular see Dray et al., 2019). During this process, the model is run with a 2005 base year and outcomes between 2005 and the present day are assessed against observed outcomes.
To what extent do input data come from publicly available sources?
Based on both publicly available and restricted-access sources
Is the full model database as such available to external users?
YES - Note that some model data is confidential and so a simplified version is provided in the public database
Have model results been presented in publicly available reports?
YES
Have output datasets been made publicly available?
NO - There is no limitation on making model outputs public
Is there any user friendly interface presenting model results that is accessible to the public?
NO
Has the model been documented in a publicly available dedicated report or a manual?
YES

Intellectual property rights

Licence type
Free Software licence

application to the impact assessment

Please note that in the annex 4 of the impact assessment report, the general description of the model (available in MIDAS) has to be complemented with the specific information on how the model has been applied in the impact assessment.

See Better Regulation Toolbox, tool #11 Format of the impact assessment report).